Date Dec 29, 2006 User vita Rating Safe Score 3
Anonymous
about 12 years ago
Anyone know where to find a scan of the first volume? Or the art under the price?

Heck, Where would I find the entire thing?
 
Anonymous
about 12 years ago
mega-win.
but where do you find those fantastic scan??
 
Date Dec 6, 2006 User admin2 Rating Safe Score 6 Hidden 9
Anonymous
about 12 years ago
Those processed versions look terrible, far too aggressive noise reduction. I'm rather have paper texture than so much detail loss.
I always thought the "paper texture effect" was because it was a scan and never as good as the original image...Never knew it was because of textured paper..Anyways this looks hard...so i need time to think about it...Btw is the post section of moe.imouto down? I can't seem to access it with IE or Firefox not even with another com...
Anonymous
about 12 years ago
Server ran out of hd space, problem solved
Processing for textured paper causes a drastic drop in detail, but for "untextured" (Sorry for my ignorance but I have no idea what its called...) paper is the detail lost as much? can I request a link for a scan with "untextured" paper for reference. I think the 600dpi should stay though because it is easy to resize with a image editing softwares. Actually I think a poll or something would be rather useful in seeking public opinion on this matter. Seeing as how only two of us have replied to this post which is strange... Unless people don't really care about it one way or the other as long as they get their scans...
600dpi and unprocessed, the latest artbook sure is a great Christmas gift for me. Thanks for setting it that way! Sorry for the super late reply, was messing around with photopaper...
 
First Post. ^^ ▲
I've been lurking for a bit. Just hope this place doesn't turn into another danbooru.
 
 
Date Dec 4, 2006 User admin2 Rating Safe Score 9
This had alot of dust on it, was lazy to remove so used filters to remove but reduces detail oh well, have fun
 
Date Dec 2, 2006 User vita Rating Questionable Score 62
 
Date Dec 2, 2006 User vita Rating Safe Score 19