Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
Date Sep 28, 2010UserikenaikotoRating SafeScore32Hidden6
In this case Shinia becomes official artist, shouldn't aizawa_hikaru done by other artist not gaining microsoft tag? Which generally applies to other circle tag and fanart relation as well.
An-chan said: In this case Shinia becomes official artist, shouldn't aizawa_hikaru done by other artist not gaining microsoft tag? Which generally applies to other circle tag and fanart relation as well.
Yep, that's why I set it as "copyright" which is like "Touhou". If you people wanna define it as a circle, we should only tag the offical art.
Aa-h, missed it being a copyright tag. Just for consideration, microsoft being a company is more suitable for a circle tag though, shouldn't we get another appropriate copyright tag to host these girls, perhaps microsoft_software or something?
Manabi said: Maybe, maybe not, none of the girls seem to have noticed that Mugi-chan's a yuri fanatic, so I still have a chance of slipping under the radar. ( ̄∇ ̄)
I'm sorry, I have read this statement at least fifty times over and I CANNOT stop laughing from it. Or, at least, giggling, I have never laughed as far as I can remember.
Salgada said: I'm sorry, I have read this statement at least fifty times over and I CANNOT stop laughing from it. Or, at least, giggling, I have never laughed as far as I can remember.
Glad to hear it, I was trying to be funny, and I Hope you enjoyed laughing/giggling at my silliness! ヾ(´▽`)ノ
(I like making people laugh actually. ( ̄ー ̄)(ー_ー)( ̄ー ̄)(ー_−)ういうい♪ )
Osikaa said: What is funny about it? I find it really beautiful. ·_·
Hm, yes, a girl with a seductive smile on her face laying in a sexy pose that exposes some 'private parts'. I would say that this is cute, not beautiful, beautiful would be her in a Lolita fashion dress sitting elegantly on the bed, or more preferably a dark colored chair.
I can be very disregarding, fear me *Mutters something*.
Salgada said: Hm, yes, a girl with a seductive smile on her face laying in a sexy pose that exposes some 'private parts'. I would say that this is cute, not beautiful, beautiful would be her in a Lolita fashion dress sitting elegantly on the bed, or more preferably a dark colored chair.
I can be very disregarding, fear me *Mutters something*.
o_O Well, I also was talking about color... Or you only mind about the pose and things? I admire artists that give a good coloring. I'm terrible at it. ú_ú
"A image can be tagged bottomless if the character in them is wearing panties or a swimsuit underneath their clothing."? I can't understand this at all.
blooregardo said: No because topless + bottomless = naked which they aren't.
OK, fair enough, I edited the tag description to clarify that the two shouldn't be used together so others won't get confused in the future. ( ̄~ ̄)
fireattack said: "A image can be tagged bottomless if the character in them is wearing panties or a swimsuit underneath their clothing."? I can't understand this at all.
I think the idea is a girl who's wearing a blouse, but no skirt. Even if she has panties on she'd still be "bottomless" because her skirt's removed.
Manabi said: I think the idea is a girl who's wearing a blouse, but no skirt. Even if she has panties on she'd still be "bottomless" because her skirt's removed.
I got it, but actually we only tag the images includes such things as "pantsu". So I think we should edit the wiki article.
Bulzeeb said: AZD-A9S: Those 4 are a family, Parsee and Yuugi have nothing to do with em asides appearing in the same game.
Uh~ no no no NO~! What I was referring to at that time (2 months ago post by the way for reference up above these comments) is where do the person who tagged Parsee is shown in this image?
The answer? Parsee is not in this image - tags have been corrected. THAT is what I was referring to at that time.
Hmm, seems bottomless now is more like just "no_skirt".. That's what I don't know >_> (I thought it means nopan+no_skirt before) Then I think nothing wrong that tag a image with "topless + bottomless".. because it doesn't equal naked.
fireattack
over 13 years agoAny opinion is welcome.
castle
over 13 years agoAn-chan
over 13 years agofireattack
over 13 years agoAn-chan
over 13 years agoWtfCakes
over 13 years agoAZD-A9S
over 13 years agoSalgada
over 13 years agonow.
Azusa looks so cute in that dress *blushes* What? She does...
Manabi
over 13 years agoSalgada
over 13 years agoManabi
over 13 years ago(I like making people laugh actually.
( ̄ー ̄)(ー_ー)( ̄ー ̄)(ー_−)ういうい♪ )
charly rozen
over 13 years agoSciFi
almost 14 years agoAZD-A9S
almost 14 years agocharly rozen
over 13 years agoTsubaki san
over 13 years agoRiven
over 14 years agoAflame Inferno
over 14 years agocfuser2005
over 13 years agohttp://www.hobbyheart.com
blooregardo
over 13 years agoSciFi
over 13 years agoGretchen
over 13 years agoOsikaa
over 13 years agomagnet朵
over 13 years agoOsikaa
over 13 years agoDaydreamer
over 13 years agomeans evil smile ...
Salgada
over 13 years agoI can be very disregarding, fear me *Mutters something*.
Osikaa
over 13 years agoOr you only mind about the pose and things?
I admire artists that give a good coloring. I'm terrible at it.
ú_ú
AgainWhatLearned
over 13 years agoOsikaa
over 13 years agoThank you Sxx <3
fireattack
over 13 years agoManabi
over 13 years agoI think the idea is a girl who's wearing a blouse, but no skirt. Even if she has panties on she'd still be "bottomless" because her skirt's removed.
fireattack
over 13 years agoAZD-A9S
over 13 years agoWhat I was referring to at that time (2 months ago post by the way for reference up above these comments) is where do the person who tagged Parsee is shown in this image?
The answer? Parsee is not in this image - tags have been corrected.
THAT is what I was referring to at that time.
Bulzeeb
over 13 years agofireattack
over 13 years ago