Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
Mr_GT said: Can you expand on that? What do you mean by objectively an improvement?
Only that the revised image didn't create any new problems compared to the original, and the image quality remains similar or better (resolution, file size, etc).
In cases where nothing was wrong with the original image, yet it was revised with new elements added, recoloring, and/or significant redrawing, those could fall under subjective changes where there may be artistic merit to keep both original and revised.
If the original and revised appear identical at quick glance, may as well keep only the new version unless someone identifies an actual reason why the original was superior. For the purpose of moderation in this case, I'd see no harm with a remove first, check later policy.
Cyberbeing
In cases where nothing was wrong with the original image, yet it was revised with new elements added, recoloring, and/or significant redrawing, those could fall under subjective changes where there may be artistic merit to keep both original and revised.
If the original and revised appear identical at quick glance, may as well keep only the new version unless someone identifies an actual reason why the original was superior. For the purpose of moderation in this case, I'd see no harm with a remove first, check later policy.