Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
(post #75708) Since I saw this image, I noticed how NeatImage preserve the edges. Adjust brightness of edges nearly equal 0, then apply NeatImage with setting lowest fine tuner into 0. then you can get similar result. I think the reason is that noise level of edges become 0, hence they can avoid filtering.
this idea can also amplifiy on other filters. for example: dupe layer > filtering > reveal mask > aplply image from back ground (under) layer into the mask > manage tonecurves at the mask.
but it have one problem. if edges couldn't reach at darkest value, it have to get filtering :/ (you can see this problem on the post #75708)
midzki
(post #75708)
Since I saw this image, I noticed how NeatImage preserve the edges.
Adjust brightness of edges nearly equal 0, then apply NeatImage with setting lowest fine tuner into 0. then you can get similar result.
I think the reason is that noise level of edges become 0, hence they can avoid filtering.
this idea can also amplifiy on other filters.
for example: dupe layer > filtering > reveal mask > aplply image from back ground (under) layer into the mask > manage tonecurves at the mask.
but it have one problem. if edges couldn't reach at darkest value, it have to get filtering :/ (you can see this problem on the post #75708)