someone who understands more of this know if it is okay remove those loli tags?

Nepcoheart said:
someone who understands more of this know if it is okay remove those loli tags?

I've reverted those invalid edits for now (also added a negative record to that user).

Well technically, they are not exactly in the lolicon target zone regarding their bodies, but Vanilla is close enough to put the tag on according to the site's "better safe..." policy.

TheUnspoken said:
Well technically, they are not exactly in the lolicon target zone regarding their bodies, but Vanilla is close enough to put the tag on according to the site's "better safe..." policy.

These are old comments, but even according to their creator, Chocola and Vanilla are Loli characters. They've been tagged as such on their Pixiv multiple times.

The issue with Loli is that in Japan it's become a blanket term for anything underage, and in terms of manga and anime, it's the word they used that's synonymous with the word 'Bishoujo' (a specific kind of art style). A perfect example of this is the anime 'Dream Dimension Hunter Fandora', which was created because Go Nagai wanted to create a Lolicon Anime back in the 1980s when this style of art was at its most popular. Anyone looking at the design of Fandora nowadays would conclude it looks like a 'normal' anime, and that's because what westerners assume to be 'normal' anime is in actuality Lolicon anime in Japan. Personally, I thought there was a shift from the usage of the classical definition of Lolita which is an underage teenage girl with a voluptuous body to the more recent archetype among younger Japanese internet users, with Bishoujo and Moe replacing the definition of Lolicon, but upon delving into the 1990s and 2000s Comiket and Doujin scene, the word Lolita has consistently been used to describe characters with the body-type of Lum from Urusei Yatsura, so the problem is when and why the west formed a completely different definition than that of Japan.