Close
fireattack said:
About bottomless:
Now I found our definition is musch closer to danbooru's no_pants instead of its bottomless. IMO, danbooru's difinition meets this word's original meaning better, and actually I was tagging as so before.

Why not change ours to be consistent with danbooru's?
I don't understand why we need to match ours to theirs. Maybe for consistency sake, but we're not danbooru.