We have "fixme" for posts that need fixing, and things like "crease" for specific things. Some posts have been tagged with crease, etc., but not fixme. Let's use "fixme" along with the others, so searching for fixme gives posts that currently need fixing.

And--I've been doing this for a while--remove fixme when the image has been fixed, so you don't have to wade through already-fixed posts when searching fixme. (This is why there aren't crease->tagme implications, etc.)

(No need to use fixme when something's not really fixable, like jpeg_artifacts and blurry.)

Watermarks could probably qualify for fixme tags, too...

I go back to the "tagme" every so often hoping I know them this time, lol ^^

A lot of the 'fixme' scans are simply not fixable. Do you think that the users will be able to identify scans which can be fixed? Seriously?

I think a lot of finer details of tagging will always be lost on casual users and it'll always be up to people who care about particular classes of tags to maintain them.

Radioactive said:
A lot of the 'fixme' scans are simply not fixable. Do you think that the users will be able to identify scans which can be fixed? Seriously?

True. Without major reconstruction, some of the fixme are simply not fixable.