Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
The irregular noise that was left behind in post #52817 bugs me: it looks more like JPEG artifacts than anything else. Tried replacing the shadow blur with a regular surface blur (rad 5, thr 8). It seems to work a bit better: the darks aren't blurred quite as much, but it's more consistent in the lighter areas.
Both of these completely lose the blush lines. They're just so fine that I don't know anything that can be done about it. midzki: are the blush lines visible on the actual page? I've seen some POP images where blush lines are visible in the scan that I can't see on paper.
petopeto
The irregular noise that was left behind in post #52817 bugs me: it looks more like JPEG artifacts than anything else. Tried replacing the shadow blur with a regular surface blur (rad 5, thr 8). It seems to work a bit better: the darks aren't blurred quite as much, but it's more consistent in the lighter areas.
Both of these completely lose the blush lines. They're just so fine that I don't know anything that can be done about it. midzki: are the blush lines visible on the actual page? I've seen some POP images where blush lines are visible in the scan that I can't see on paper.