Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
Checkmate said: With the opinion of jkdfahlkdhfjgakdhfg considering the quality being inferior simply because the md5 does not match with the original, I'll dismiss it completely. I also won't bother with duplicate detection reason.
On to other EXIF data: most of the time, the images are being cleaned and therefore, such EXIF data are also goner. Additionally, many scanner does not embed such data in the first place (unlike cameras).
The only valid argument left would be the ICC color profiling.
Just curious, what's the pros of stripping exif? Saving space? Or in other worlds, what's the downside of *not* stripping exif?
I'm asking so because the sole reason we started to do that is because of animepaper, and it's gone already.
Non-matching md5 obviously doesn't mean it's inferior, but wouldn't it be nice to have identical file if it doesn't do harm?
fireattack
I'm asking so because the sole reason we started to do that is because of animepaper, and it's gone already.
Non-matching md5 obviously doesn't mean it's inferior, but wouldn't it be nice to have identical file if it doesn't do harm?