Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
A game with a good gameplay will always be good even if its storyline is nonexistant, simple or absolutely ridiculous. See new Ninja Gaiden games, the Splinter Cell series, practically all the most important fighting game franchises (call it Street Fighter, Samurai Shodown, Guilty Gear, Virtua Fighter, etc), TETRIS, Super Mario games, the Doom series, the Dragon Warrior series, etc. Most of them don't have such deep or complicated storyline (or don't have any at all) and they're all excellent games that marked their respective generations.
But... a good story won't save a game with a shitty/wasted/defficient gameplay. See:
-A lot of the now-generic-it's-so-boring JRPGs. -Killer 7. -Killzone 2. -The Call of Duty game released after the first Modern Warfare. Based on WW2, historical crap, etc. but the game was boring as heck. -Silent Hill Homecoming... simply horrible.
In few words:
A good story can make a good gameplay experience better, but it's not necessary. A game with a bad gameplay will ALWAYS be bad, it doesn't matter if the plotline was written by House MD writers or similars (to put an example).
kyoushiro
A game with a good gameplay will always be good even if its storyline is nonexistant, simple or absolutely ridiculous. See new Ninja Gaiden games, the Splinter Cell series, practically all the most important fighting game franchises (call it Street Fighter, Samurai Shodown, Guilty Gear, Virtua Fighter, etc), TETRIS, Super Mario games, the Doom series, the Dragon Warrior series, etc. Most of them don't have such deep or complicated storyline (or don't have any at all) and they're all excellent games that marked their respective generations.
But... a good story won't save a game with a shitty/wasted/defficient gameplay. See:
-A lot of the now-generic-it's-so-boring JRPGs.
-Killer 7.
-Killzone 2.
-The Call of Duty game released after the first Modern Warfare. Based on WW2, historical crap, etc. but the game was boring as heck.
-Silent Hill Homecoming... simply horrible.
In few words:
A good story can make a good gameplay experience better, but it's not necessary. A game with a bad gameplay will ALWAYS be bad, it doesn't matter if the plotline was written by House MD writers or similars (to put an example).