Close
Radioactive said:
Until it has been tested in the courts I can't answer that.

You need to watch out for these:

(2) A prohibited image is an image which—

(a) is pornographic,

(b) falls within subsection (6), and

(c) is grossly offensive, disgusting or otherwise of an obscene character

(3) An image is “pornographic” if it is of such a nature that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal.
how can they make such a law? You'd first have to define what makes an image porn. Sexual acts? What is considered a sexual act exactly?
What is grossly offensive? Something that another guy would find grossly offensive, another guy could find it really nice.
Produced to purpose sexual arousal? What if it was made just because the artist felt like it? The greatest thing about being an artist is the fact that NOBODY can tell you what you can do and what you can't do. This kind of law is against the artists freedom