Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
AZD-A9S said: Is there some reason why UK is making these types of laws? It's only fictional drawing...right?
van said: This sort of law quickly falls into absurdity. The lesson? Trying to apply the laws of reality to fiction is futile, and you will almost surely make yourself look foolish in the process.
Seems like UK enjoys creating non-sense rules. They should be worried better with the well-fare of the population than with hentai and loli stuff. Or is it that dangerous? OH my God, he's seeing a hentai picture! OMG stop him or he will kill someone!
Azarel said: What is grossly offensive? What if it was made just because the artist felt like it? The greatest thing about being an artist is the fact that NOBODY can tell you what you can do and what you can't do. This kind of law is against the artists freedom
Now you talked sweet. Surely everybody here agrees with you, Azarel. I thought we finally had freedom,at least of expression, nowadays...
Radioactive said: An image is “pornographic” if it is of such a nature that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal.
Urotan doujins were created with that purpose. But I don't use them with this purpose. Therefore, they are not pornographic to me, and can't be forbidden to people who uses them the same way I do. So what if someone wants to have that kind of product? Who can tell if they will use that to sexual arousal, or not? Laws can't tell that. Porn doesn't hurt anyone. And there is not a single reason to prohibit it.
Debbie
Now you talked sweet. Surely everybody here agrees with you, Azarel. I thought we finally had freedom,at least of expression, nowadays...
Urotan doujins were created with that purpose. But I don't use them with this purpose. Therefore, they are not pornographic to me, and can't be forbidden to people who uses them the same way I do. So what if someone wants to have that kind of product? Who can tell if they will use that to sexual arousal, or not? Laws can't tell that. Porn doesn't hurt anyone. And there is not a single reason to prohibit it.