Close
This post was deleted. Reason: . MD5: adfc1cb864ac989f897c9b7b124caf7f
This post belongs to a parent post.


Edit | Respond

Aren't pixiv posts usually the parent?
The pixiv and twitter images are "pixel perfect duplicates." So the pixiv image is not better and likely won't be kept. The pixiv image was posted an hour after the twitter image, so the Twitter image would be the parent.
Spidey said:
Aren't pixiv posts usually the parent?
The difference in data size of these pictures is the difference in the compression method: progressive or non-progressive. Pixel by pixel they are exactly the same picture, the only difference is that I posted mine earlier, as you can see from the ID and the time.
"Duplicates should be set as children of already existing posts when all the above criteria are identical in both pictures." So if the already existing duplicate post is Twitter, that's the parent.

That is Danbooru's parent guidelines, and seems to be what yande.re agrees with.
Will duplicate be made to remain in the future? If so, I would remove deletion flag.
hiroimo2 said:
Will duplicate be made to remain in the future? If so, I would remove deletion flag.
What Genex means above is probably "which copy should be treated as duplicate", not "whether duplicates should be kept or not".
That's it. As for whether duplicates should be kept or not is up to the moderators.
I just want to clarify, if both posts are the same (pixel matching or of very similar quality) but come from different sources. They should be classified as duplicates. In this case, the newer post should be deleted for duplicate reason.
Understood. Thank you for your answer.
Thanks for the input, I'll proceed to delete this one, then.