It's not yuri, see the left bottom there's a men's hand

goodman007 said:
It's not yuri, see the left bottom there's a men's hand

how is it not yuri with two girls kissing?

The definition of yuri is
"Any romantic or sexual interaction between female characters. It doesn't matter if it's mutual or one-sided. "

Oh, You are right.
So when two girls kisses and touch each other nake; no matter if there's a man that's fucking them, it is yuri .

It's a gray area

I don't know myself to consider Yuri a dojin where there is a "FFM" threesome (2 females + 1 males), where very often the 2 females have fun between themselves during the "Study session", it's kinda annoying.

If I am not wrong on nhentai there's a tag called "Female only" which should filter out yuri dojins with a FFM scenario, however it would be nice to have a single tag to define "Yuri and nothing else" :v

goodman007 said:
there's a man that's fucking them

I hope you're not talking about this image, as it's a very big assumption here, seeing that there's no male can be explicitly seen within the canvas of the image (including that hand, yes - how do you know someone with darker and relatively rough skin must be a male?).

moonian said:
I hope you're not talking about this image, as it's a very big assumption here, seeing that there's no male can be explicitly seen within the canvas of the image (including that hand, yes - how do you know someone with darker and relatively rough skin must be a male?).

Oh no! someone is assuming someone else's gender on the internet, call the police 👀👀

Marona762 said:
Oh no! someone is assuming someone else's gender on the internet, call the police 👀👀

Sorry, but no joking here, as it's very important NOT to assume anything you can't observe within an image while tagging.

When it's yuri, it's yuri. No further discussion needed.

Arknovalisk said:
When it's yuri, it's yuri. No further discussion needed.

Dilemma:
"Is this yuri?"

Argument:
"When it's yuri, it's yuri"

Great point there 10/10

It's great, because there shouldn't be a discussion to begin with.
The dilemma has no footing.

Arknovalisk said:
It's great, because there shouldn't be a discussion to begin with.
The dilemma has no footing.

I don't think you missed that the discussion was diverted into a broader point not specific to this image in particular - the point that an image with yuri elements isn't always considered yuri.

Also

If you think there's no discussion to be needed just don't reply then.

Yes, I do reply, to cut short pointless discussions like this.
Sadly it didn't work because there's some stubborn people who can't accept obvious definitions.
Even if they were being fucked in both holes by multiple men, if they are sexually teasing each other, it's also going to be yuri.
You know very well that this site doesn't do fringe/nuance tags to make little distinctions like "female only".

moonian said:
Sorry, but no joking here, as it's very important NOT to assume anything you can't observe within an image while tagging.

the artist tagged it hetero on pixiv, so I think we can safely assume its a man. Though I get what you're saying.