Doesn't this count as wardrobe_malfunction?

Marona762 said:
Doesn't this count as wardrobe_malfunction?

And what would you mean by "this?" My best guess would be "her chest has quickly grown and burst out" is what's supposed to be going on. But "my best" here doesn't mean it's good enough. No idea what the artist tried to convey.

Marona762 said:
Doesn't this count as wardrobe_malfunction?

yrumddldluxduzrf said:
And what would you mean by "this?" My best guess would be "her chest has quickly grown and burst out" is what's supposed to be going on. But "my best" here doesn't mean it's good enough. No idea what the artist tried to convey.

From the Parent Post's source: https://www.pixiv.net/artworks/95370719

ノーブラで男の子と初詣に行ったら意図せず着崩れちゃったJKちゃん

So, to me, it seems to be a wardrobe malfunction situation.

yrumddldluxduzrf said:
And what would you mean by "this?" My best guess would be "her chest has quickly grown and burst out" is what's supposed to be going on. But "my best" here doesn't mean it's good enough. No idea what the artist tried to convey.

Your best guess is something as unrealistic as a woman's chest growing in size so quickly to the point of not fitting her clothes?

I mean, okay, that's a guess, my best guess would be that her chest didn't magically suddenly expanded but was barely contained within the clothes which after some point just gave up to the pressure and burst ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Marona762 said:
Your best guess is something as unrealistic as a woman's chest growing in size so quickly to the point of not fitting her clothes?

I mean, okay, that's a guess, my best guess would be that her chest didn't magically suddenly expanded but was barely contained within the clothes which after some point just gave up to the pressure and burst ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Contained by what? It's a robe, it only has one belt to hold it in place. From the ways her thigh area looks, the belt is undisturbed. A robe can fail resulting in nipple or boobie slippage, but if it just doesn't cover the front, it has to be undersized, therefore having not enough material to be worn properly. Now how does an upper half of a robe fail to cover breasts, apparently only reaching as far as the girl's sides, when at the same time it's covering one shoulder and hangs off the other like an oversized blouse would? And it had to have happened right before the moment caught in the image. It's a mechanical absurdity.

Uhmm

Let's examine the context
From the parent post https://yande.re/post/show/909418 there are some text in the image, one speech bubble is

あ・・うち･･･違うの・・・
こ･･･これは･･･
キミのことドキドキさせようと思って
あえて下着つけてこなかっただけで...

The other is

決してこーゆー露出趣味が
あるわけじゃないから・・・っ
ううう!!

Google translates that into:

"
Ah... my... it's not...
Th-This is···
I want to make your heart beat faster
I didn't dare to wear underwear...

The other is

I never have a hobby of exposing myself
It's not like there is...
Uuu!!
"
Artist's commentary says:

男の子をドキドキさせるためにノーブラで初詣に行ったら意図せず着崩れしちゃったポニテJKちゃん

Google Translate tells:

"Ponytail JK who unintentionally fell apart when I went to New Year's shrine visit without a bra to make a boy's heart beat"

Uhmm

Dunno what's the context ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Marona762 said:
Uhmm

Let's examine the context
From the parent post https://yande.re/post/show/909418 there are some text in the image, one speech bubble is

あ・・うち･･･違うの・・・
こ･･･これは･･･
キミのことドキドキさせようと思って
あえて下着つけてこなかっただけで...

...

Google translates that into:

"
Ah... my... it's not...
Th-This is···
I want to make your heart beat faster
I didn't dare to wear underwear...

...

Probably wrong translation here - by context, it should be "on purpose" here instead: https://ejje.weblio.jp/content/%E6%95%A2%E3%81%88%E3%81%A6 (Google Translate picked up another meaning of the same phrase)

So that sentence should read (roughly) "I didn't wear underwear on purpose."

That's probably why you got confused XD

If it's a new year shrine visit, then the garment was meant to be a kimono, not a robe..Making it even harder to malfunction into giving total freedom for breasts yet still covering the shoulders. The artist didn't do a good job at depicting visually what he implies with the commentary. I don' think the wardrobe_malfunction applies to the image.