Close
This post belongs to a parent post.
Search
Tags
  • ? ssk (user urmv3444) 4
  • ? azur lane 41320
  • ? aegir (azur lane) 512
  • ? ass 107919
  • ? cameltoe 54011
  • ? feet 49436
  • ? horns 54714
  • ? maid 35887
  • ? no bra 186674
  • ? pantsu 169249
  • ? see through 72714
  • ? skirt lift 108757
  • ? stockings 41260
  • ? thighhighs 249522
  • ? thong 36791
  • ? torn clothes 23182
    • panties camel toe see-through pantsuga underwear soles nobra ripped clothes ripped clothing torn thighhighs azurlane bilan hangxian thighighs pantsu2 tighhighs panties under pantyhose ass visible through thighs thighhigh pink panties big ass foot hold-ups g-string black panties pink pantsu blue pantsu pantsy ass focus thighboots /dress up/ dress up thigh boots holding skirt presenting ass huge feet dress lift bow panties white panties white thighhighs long horns foot focus agir (azur lane) red panties huge ass frilled panties visable panties panty peek blue panties orange panties single thighhigh sockings lace panties frilled thighhighs maid panties black thighhighs dragon horns demon horns
Options
Related Posts




aegir_(azur_lane) ass azur_lane cameltoe feet horns maid no_bra pantsu see_through skirt_lift ssk_(user_urmv3444) stockings thighhighs thong torn_clothes

Edit | Respond

whitespace1
over 1 year ago
我想問為什麼1天前發的low-res
圖現在就過了，我兩個月前發的圖到現在還沒審核過
這裡的標準是什麼?
乐观的食用盐
over 1 year ago
whitespace1 said:
這裡的標準是什麼?
“謎”
fireattack
over 1 year ago
low-res理论上只有“高质量”（纯mod主观判断）的才会被通过，3天内不通过就会被系统自动删除（和danbooru一样）
但是实际上这个3天内删除的机制不知道因为什么原因并没有启用

所以原则上不要上传low-res，愿意传也可以，不过不要觉得一定会过就是
whitespace1
over 1 year ago
fireattack said:
low-res理论上只有“高质量”（纯mod主观判断）的才会被通过，3天内不通过就会被系统自动删除（和danbooru一样）
但是实际上这个3天内删除的机制不知道因为什么原因并没有启用

所以原则上不要上传low-res，愿意传也可以，不过不要觉得一定会过就是
了解了，以後不上傳low-res了
hiroimo2
over 1 year ago
@fireattack
I also have a question about low-res standards.
The message warns post a picture of 1,600,000 dots or more, but in reality even more than that may be pending. I would like to know the standard for true low-res. Once I know that, I won't post anything less than that next time.
moonian
over 1 year ago
hiroimo2 said:
@fireattack
I also have a question about low-res standards.
The message warns post a picture of 1,600,000 dots or more, but in reality even more than that may be pending. I would like to know the standard for true low-res. Once I know that, I won't post anything less than that next time.
It's still pending for review if an image is > 1.6M pixels but < ~1.9M pixels. Which means even it's above the hard threshold of 1.6M pixels, it still has a chance of getting deleted eventually.
hiroimo2
over 1 year ago
moonian said:
It's still pending for review if an image is > 1.6M pixels but < ~1.9M pixels. Which means even it's above the hard threshold of 1.6M pixels, it still has a chance of getting deleted eventually.
Thank you for your answer, I will try to be more selective in posting my 1.6M to 1.9Mpixcel pictures.
moonian
over 1 year ago
fireattack said:
See also: forum #20821
Yeah, forgotten the exception for physical scans.
hiroimo2
over 1 year ago
fireattack said:
See also: forum #20821
Thank you. I also checked this rule.
jesurfing
over 1 year ago
I'm glad to see so many Chinese friends here.