Great...Just noticed someone at Danbooru added the AI-Assisted tag on this image. Hive moderation gives it a "not likely AI" score of 25.1

The evidence speaks more for Aoi using traditional painting methods, not AI.
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/108026805
Check the second image.

Just wanted to bring this up before anyone else does.

The style looks an AI... ?

Genex said:
Great...Just noticed someone at Danbooru added the AI-Assisted tag on this image. Hive moderation gives it a "not likely AI" score of 25.1

The evidence speaks more for Aoi using traditional painting methods, not AI.
https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/108026805
Check the second image.

Just wanted to bring this up before anyone else does.

No ideas, but: https://www.pixiv.net/artworks/107833756

In the comments, someone asked if this is AI-drawn, but the artist claimed it's drawn manually.

It's all like a joke! A person has drawn a picture by his hand and people says he used AI, this is so funny in this generation...

掛載LoRA線稿模型+ControlNet就能自動上色了，甚至還能修正手稿，所以現在很多飯盒裡面都會附上制作過程GIF或是タイムラプス影片佐證繪師自己的創作過程，是不是使用AI只能掏錢進去看，可惜這繪師不是我喜歡的畫風。

Nice catch moonian. Aoi referenced her Twitter as proof.

https://twitter.com/6Yaoyue

乐观的食用盐 said:
It's all like a joke! A person has drawn a picture by his hand and people says he used AI, this is so funny in this generation...

Not so funny. Because anyone can and does tag "AI assisted" in a Danbooru image, it stays there, but the same image can get deleted here on that tagger's word alone.

乐观的食用盐 said:
It's all like a joke! A person has drawn a picture by his hand and people says he used AI, this is so funny in this generation...

Funny? You mean sad...

I don't see "Funny" part when they scam me...

BattlequeenYume said:
Funny? You mean sad...

I'm not good at English, thanks to correct it.
In this situation I would say 'ridiculous'.

Arsy said:
I don't see "Funny" part when they scam me...

Sorry, I was meaning ridiculous, and I express deep sorrow to this artist.

Genex said:
Not so funny. Because anyone can and does tag "AI assisted" in a Danbooru image, it stays there, but the same image can get deleted here on that tagger's word alone.

For this post's condition, we can find the artist's clarify by themselves. But if the source doesn't show whether it uses AI assistance, how do we know from it?

乐观的食用盐 said:
I'm not good at English, thanks to correct it.
In this situation I would say 'ridiculous'.

LOL. I got you from the beginning that you were being sarcastic when you said "funny", and you were actually criticizing that attitude from those people and supporting the artist, but the guys here didn't seem to get what you meant. ;)

Yes, Thorcsf. You're right, thanks for understanding.