Close
This post has a child post. (post #1097058)


crossover dikko hololive indie_virtual_youtuber loli naked nipples oozora_subaru photoshop pussy pussy_juice shigure_ui_(virtual_youtuber) uncensored wet yuri

Edit | Respond

There's a set over at fantia posted on Danbooru. I decided to decensor and post one of them and see how it goes. Mods let me know if there's a problem.
While decensor was done nice, I really feel like this (and another two previous sets, that weren't posted here yet) is ai-assisted, ever since I saw this on Danbooru (they even had a discussion in parent post. Not sure if they come up to any conclusion tho) . At least bodies, even just comparing to previous works.

Does anyone else feel the same?
Adobe Photoshop's AI is sourced from their own library of licensed stock images. I don't think "AI is theft" fits here.

"Designed to be commercially safe: You can create confidently, as Adobe Firefly is trained on Adobe Stock’s hundreds of millions of professional-grade licensed, high-resolution images, which helps ensure Adobe Firefly won’t generate content based on other people’s work, brands, or intellectual property."

https://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop/using/generative-fill.html

Censored or decensored, Dikko's images scores 99 on hive moderation, but Danbooru hasn't called it yet.
Genex said:
Adobe Photoshop's AI is sourced from their own library of licensed stock images. I don't think "AI is theft" fits here.
Point is NOT how an AI model is licensed - we here consider only whether an image is AI-generated/AI-assisted. So those images created with this AI function of Photoshop still won't be accepted.