Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
This post was deleted.
Reason: could be AI. MD5: da99542ee636e8528722da4ce8315420
panties pantsuga underwear tights torn pantyhose open-chest sweater virgin killer sweater turtleneck sweater turtleneck pantsu2 ribbed sweater panties under pantyhose thigh band virgin killer sweater vest thighband pantyhose pink bra pink panties orange sweater black panties lace bra pink pantsu blue pantsu bra strap cardigan aqua cardigan pantsy /dress up/ dress up pantyhouse holding skirt black bra sports bra dress lift bow panties white panties red panties frilled panties visable panties panty peek blue panties orange panties strapless bra lace panties white bra rio (blue archive) maid panties sensei (blue archive)
I mean, if we using "could be AI" to delete artworks then a lot of other artworks could be marked as such. But back to your question, going through usual signs of AI images (https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/ai-generated): 1) image resolution is good 2) metadata is clear of AI stuff 3) no abnormalities on the image (at least I can't see any) 4) sure, artist seemed as brand new at that time, but they didn't release huge amount of artworks in a short period of time
I know these signs are not an ideal way of identifying whether image in as AI artwork or not, but reason "could be AI" is not ideal too
FutureTribute
2 months agomoonian
2 months agoFutureTribute
2 months ago1) image resolution is good
2) metadata is clear of AI stuff
3) no abnormalities on the image (at least I can't see any)
4) sure, artist seemed as brand new at that time, but they didn't release huge amount of artworks in a short period of time
I know these signs are not an ideal way of identifying whether image in as AI artwork or not, but reason "could be AI" is not ideal too
FutureTribute
2 months agoCheckmate
2 months agoKojuni
2 months ago