Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
I think the problem with images being deleted as "poor quality art" is that there doesn't appear to be any definition of what is and isn't "poor quality". I know I've had some deleted with that reason, and yet images already on here, drawn in the same style (they were basically part of a series where the artist did drawings stylistically of all the characters from an anime) weren't. And those had been here for some time, which was why I uploaded the others. ( ̄~ ̄;)
I just hadn't said anything, but I would appreciate some guidance on this, as would everyone else I'm sure. Right now it just seems totally arbitrary and it's quite confusing. ( ̄Д)=3
Amperrior
about 14 years agoblooregardo
about 14 years agoRadioactive
about 14 years agoOsikaa
about 14 years agoDebbie
about 14 years agoThis is mediocre. post #103246
ashorichan
about 14 years agovan
about 14 years agoRiven
about 14 years agoAmperrior
about 14 years agoDebbie
about 14 years agoHey, poor E-shuushuu, that's not true. Mediocre definition is too subjective and relative.
ashorichan
about 14 years agoWtfCakes
about 14 years ago...and vectors nekkid lolis.
Riven
about 14 years agoCrim draws too; he's pretty good.
blooregardo
about 14 years agocrim
about 14 years agoIt's not crim-chan (・∀・)
WtfCakes
about 14 years agoAmperrior
about 14 years agoblooregardo
about 14 years agoEdit: wut, you edited your post.
Manabi
about 14 years agoI think the problem with images being deleted as "poor quality art" is that there doesn't appear to be any definition of what is and isn't "poor quality". I know I've had some deleted with that reason, and yet images already on here, drawn in the same style (they were basically part of a series where the artist did drawings stylistically of all the characters from an anime) weren't. And those had been here for some time, which was why I uploaded the others. ( ̄~ ̄;)
I just hadn't said anything, but I would appreciate some guidance on this, as would everyone else I'm sure. Right now it just seems totally arbitrary and it's quite confusing. ( ̄Д)=3
chi29
about 14 years ago