This post was deleted.
Reason: Duplicate. MD5: 708ab7892d9cd2aef27d2a515ee452a9
This post belongs to a parent post.
|
Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
|
MDGeist
over 16 years agopetopeto
over 16 years agoRadioactive
over 16 years agopetopeto
over 16 years agoI think this set is a good indication of the problem with P/C. The one that was parented is at 13, the rest (even ignoring the, uh, "futanari-shota" or whatever ones) are all around 2.
IMO, this is the single biggest technical issue with the site right now. By the amount it affects a post's visibility, making someone P/C a post is almost the same as having them not post it at all.
From what I remember, the problem you had with blacklists is how it leaves holes in pages. Is that really such a problem for you? It seems to me like P/C is a cure worse than the disease.
Radioactive
over 16 years agoThere are times when hiding posts from the index is worth doing. Dupes are a good example.
If we did get rid of P/C would you want to use Pools as the only grouping system?
Had a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futanari and you are right. Used the wrong terminology.
petopeto
over 16 years agoWe know that blacklists have a problem: they result in holes in the index. But I think that's much better than P/C's problem (nobody ever sees the posts).
Other than how it displays partial pages (and occasionally, even blank pages), do you have any other issues with using blacklists instead of P/C? (Fixing the partial pages is hard, but if you have other problems I might be able to fix them.)
I agree, I don't have any problem with using it for dupes.
Radioactive
over 16 years agopetopeto
over 16 years ago