Danbooru-based image board with a specialization in high-quality images.
This post belongs to a parent post.
aomi_maika karory seifuku

Edit | Respond

Check your own fingers and..
fireattack said:
Check your own fingers and..
Don't speak it out!
Can't remove the notes even I try to undo the notes history orz
I can do that with my right hand, no problem
It's not about the gesture but the anatomy. Check the length of last phalange of your fingers..
More like one exists more than there should be.
I measured my pinky finger, distal phalanx length to middle phalanx length ratio is about 0.9

Her distal phalanx length to middle phalanx length ratio is about 0.833, not big difference
....i'm not talking about pinky finger. Measure your other fingers, which will have length ratio about 0.6, where hers are 1.x.
I think someone's just being nit-picky. :P
There are too many other images on this site with much worse problems w.
My pinky finger to index finger ratio is 0.843, pinky finger to ring finger ratio is 0.795, comparing total lengths

...well they are 2D girls, and "only 2D girls are real"
Wow, the comments of this picture contains some biology professors.
WtfCakes said:
I think someone's just being nit-picky. :P
There are too many other images on this site with much worse problems w.
Initially I just mentioned it as a joke, but aganainotoki wanted to make it serious so I followed w

aganainotoki said:
My pinky finger to index finger ratio is 0.843, pinky finger to ring finger ratio is 0.795, comparing total lengths

...well they are 2D girls, and "only 2D girls are real"
Oh my gosh, I mean index finger's distal phalanx length to middle phalanx length ratio did you ever read the picture?
I would never have noticed that finger if it weren't for the huge spotlight of attention on it ;-)
fireattack said:
Initially I just mentioned it as a joke, but aganainotoki wanted to make it serious so I followed w

Oh my gosh, I mean index finger's distal phalanx length to middle phalanx length ratio did you ever read the picture?
Have you ever noticed that the pic on the left side does not show the index finger, and you meant index finger?

I knew where you found pic on the left side.

you read what you said twice, you will find that others could not tell what ratio you were talking about exactly based on the comment below
fireattack said:
....i'm not talking about pinky finger. Measure your other fingers, which will have length ratio about 0.6, where hers are 1.x.

Sorry, I mean ring finger. I didn't notice you mentioned two ratios and directly copied your words.

But anyway, I still don't know why you started talking about index finger to little finger ratio which is irrelevant with our topic? I'm always talking about last/second phalanx ratio of a certain finger, not between fingers.

aganainotoki said:
you read what you said twice, you will find that others could not tell what ratio you were talking about exactly based on the comment below
fireattack said:
....i'm not talking about pinky finger. Measure your other fingers, which will have length ratio about 0.6, where hers are 1.x.
Why not? Didn't you see I put measure lines on the picture?
fireattack said:
Sorry, I mean ring finger. I didn't notice you mentioned two ratios and directly copied your words.

But anyway, I still don't know why you started talking about index finger to little finger ratio which is irrelevant with our topic? I'm always talking about last/second phalanx ratio of a certain finger, not between fingers.

Why not? Didn't you see I put measure lines on the picture?
I saw that, however simply because you said index finger, but it's not in the pic, so that pic did not make sense
aganainotoki said:
I saw that, however simply because you said index finger, but it's not in the pic, so that pic did not make sense
But I didn't say index finger when i posted the picture...
fireattack said:
But I didn't say index finger when i posted the picture...
your comments are related with each other, right? marked one, mentioned another one later, what could you expect....

by now you've made yourself clear
aganainotoki said:
your comments are related with each other, right? marked one, mentioned another one later, what could you expect....

by now you've made yourself clear
So now you got my meaning and agreed with me that her finger is not well drawn? If so we finished this discuss finally!
fireattack said:
So now you got my meaning and agreed with me that her finger is not well drawn? If so we finished this discuss finally!
No, I have hand which is similar to hers
Um...don't suppose we could move on Boss?
aganainotoki said:
No, I have hand which is similar to hers
You only talked about your little finger. Your ring finger have similar distal phalanx length to middle phalanx length ratio like her as well?
fireattack said:
You only talked about your little finger. Your ring finger have similar distal phalanx length to middle phalanx length ratio like her as well?
I measured, no big difference, less than 10%

I've seen a girl whose hands are even more close to 2D girls than me on Comiket

BTW, if you think her(the pic) hand was not well drawn, you are free to do so.

But I have no willing to persuade anyone who has opposite opinion on the Internet on this.
what about the finger?
i think it has no problem
i look it well。。
just only the length?
or sth other wrong?
Okay guys, we are now concluding that...

her left hand fingers are unseen.
(as well as those on her feet)
aganainotoki said:
No, I have hand which is similar to hers
Wait. Your pinky finger also have 4 phalanges?
硝子鏡の夢 said:
Wait. Your pinky finger also have 4 phalanges?
she has three, I have three

if you still can not see there are only three, try it with your hand.
Lets put it to a vote, all in favor this conversation should end and agree upon the fact her ring finger is bigger than her middle finger which, as fire said, is anatomically incorrect.

Say aye.(sir)

EDIT: Grammar :(
aganainotoki said:
she has three, I have three

if you still can not see there are only three, try it with your hand.
The pinky finger in this pic has FOUR phalanges, unless you need an ophthalmologist.
nquanta said:
The pinky finger in this pic has FOUR phalanges, unless you need an ophthalmologist.
I can see why some people saying that there are four. but if you can not see it in three. you are the one who needs an ophthalmologist
Zenex said:
Lets put it to a vote, all in favor this conversation should end and agree upon the fact her ring finger is bigger than her middle finger which, as fire said, is anatomically incorrect.

Say aye.(sir)

EDIT: Grammar :(
if your "bigger" means longer

even with a hand which ring finger is shorter than middle finger, the ring finger looks longer for the gesture in the pic
Ok, mod stepping in here. This conversation is done. If you want it to continue, please take it to the forums.