Close
This post has a child post. (post #298078)
Search
Tags
  • ? azuma yuki 328
  • ? loli 53577
  • ? nipples 186986
  • ? pantsu 168208
  • ? wet clothes 16618
    • panties pantsuga underwear nipple pantsu2 panties under pantyhose pink panties loli nude black panties pink pantsu blue pantsu pantsy bow panties white panties red panties frilled panties visable panties panty peek inverted nipple blue panties orange panties puffy nipples lace panties maid panties
Options
Related Posts




azuma_yuki loli nipples pantsu wet_clothes

Edit | Respond

Bardok
about 10 years ago
Score: 91

There's a lot of pedos on this site.
DarKNovA
about 10 years ago
You mean there's a lot of people with taste, right? Surely, you just misspoke.
Bardok
about 10 years ago
Clearly this girl looks like a child, so no, I didn't ''misspoke''.
Azarel
about 10 years ago
I've seen some children in my life and they've never quite looked like this. I enjoy looking at stuff like this while children just annoy me but by your definition I'm a pedo
gibwar
about 10 years ago
That's enough, everyone has different tastes. Take this to the forum if you want to continue this pointless discussion.
DarKNovA
about 10 years ago
Yet you contribute with your selective post deletion, good job~
Radioactive
about 10 years ago
DarKNovA said:
Yet you contribute with your selective post deletion, good job~
I hope that wasn't aimed at gibwar
DarKNovA
about 10 years ago
It was aimed at the one doing the deleting.
His post was just coincidentally too fitting for that action for me to even think about it.
Zenex
about 10 years ago
I remember a scenario like this before and admin2 had to threaten to ban people if they continued talking about it, I don't know if it's still default but that was why rating:q / e loli/futa/beastiality was automatically blacklisted I believe?
Radioactive
about 10 years ago
IIRC only rating:e shota loli or extreme_content were on the default blacklists. Don't know if that was changed.

rating:q shota or loli needs correct tagging
gibwar
about 10 years ago
DarKNovA said:
It was aimed at the one doing the deleting.
His post was just coincidentally too fitting for that action for me to even think about it.
Yup, it was me. You decided to continue arguing rather than stopping and taking it to the forums as suggested. I originally decided against one, but I can throw in a warning for you too, if you'd like.
DarKNovA
about 10 years ago
Sure go ahead, pretty sure that will make you feel at least a bit better.
Radioactive
about 10 years ago
DarKNovA said:
Sure go ahead, pretty sure that will make you feel at least a bit better.
That's a pretty shitty attitude you've got.