If this is a photoshop, what it's a photoshop of? It should be the parent if it exists. The whole thing looks fan made and like there's a good chance that it was never censored to begin with. And not everything that's uncensored should be marked with photoshop - only images that were actually altered (be it to get rid of censoring or for someth else). What's the source for this? Can we confirm whether it was photoshopped or not? I'm certainly inclined to think that it wasn't given how the pussy matches up with the rest of the art.

Kalessin said:
If this is a photoshop, what it's a photoshop of? It should be the parent if it exists. The whole thing looks fan made and like there's a good chance that it was never censored to begin with. And not everything that's uncensored should be marked with photoshop - only images that were actually altered (be it to get rid of censoring or for someth else). What's the source for this? Can we confirm whether it was photoshopped or not? I'm certainly inclined to think that it wasn't given how the pussy matches up with the rest of the art.

Just found the original reference image and linked them, so now it makes sense:
- photoshop: removal of her bikini
- uncensored: her pussy isn't censored

And maybe vector_trace, too?

Well, if it's a vector_trace, then it's not a photoshop, since they redid the whole image rather than editing the original.

i see, i'm going ti fix tix the others if i used photoshop instead of vector trace.

Thats not photoshop, thats paint ^^