Close
This post has child posts. (post #432130, 615318, 1077283)


amasaki_ayame aoki_minami bra cleavage jitaku_studio miyanoue_kanna open_shirt real_eroge_situation! satogami_yuri seifuku sweater taiki_ken undressing

Edit | Respond

There're FOUR non-SD artists for this game but only THREE main heroines (as shown in this image), so not sure who are responsible for drawing them.

P.S. Please add the artist tag(s) only if one has concrete evidences about it.
Removed the artist tags for now until the tag-adder has provided proof.
Proof of what? If not sure who drew it just add them all. All three main characters are here anyway.
fireattack said:
Proof of what? If not sure who draw just add them all.
Please read my first comment carefully again. At least one of them is probably NOT responsible for drawing the heroines.
moonian said:
Please read my first comment carefully again. At least one of them is probably NOT responsible for drawing the heroines.
She/he only added three artists..
fireattack said:
She/he only added three artists..
Yes, I know, but how did they know it's those three but not "どどめ色マヨネーズ" draw them? I need proof for this.
In case anyone didn't read my first comment and/or the official site in the source, lemme quote the following for them:
原画
蒼木みなみ大気KEN、どどめ色マヨネーズ、ねたろぅ
米白粕(SD)
So, there are FOUR artists for ordinary graphics, and ONE for SD graphics. The BOLD ITALIC ones were what the tag-adder tagged this image.

How did they know it's this combination, but not any other?
OK, found this for the middle one: https://twitter.com/TAIKI_KEN/status/778453307719200768 :
自宅すたじお様から発売される新作ゲームに、天咲彩愛という名前のお団子キャラ(真ん中の女の子です)を描かせていただきました…!
So added that artist.
Found another two tweets for the remaining two heroines:
https://twitter.com/jitaku_st/status/778534419137048576
https://twitter.com/jitaku_st/status/778565157295304704

They mention that both of the heroines are drawn by 蒼木みなみ (aoki_minami), which also proves that the original tagging of netarou is incorrect. So, added the correct artist's tag.

The case is now closed.
moonian said:
I need proof for this
That's the problem. Proof of tagging definitely is welcome, but never a requirement. I failed to see why you need to remove his tagging in the first place just because "he didn't post proof". You may asked so, however, some people (like the majority of users here) just don't read the comments. Doesn't necessarily mean they tag arbitrarily. His tagging doesn't contradict the statement of "3 characters should only need 3 artists" either, so it is not obviously wrong.

It is not about the tag itself (which has been corrected by you). It's that you should assume other people have reasons when tagging until you prove the otherwise, even when they're silent. If they were wrong, not a big deal, change it and move on.

And if someone constantly puts wrong tags? PM them politely, which is a far better way to reach them than comments. This is not such scenario anyway.