What about a new tag, flat_chest? or something like that?

Going into too much detail.

there is a blue_eyes tag.

tyat4ever said:
there is a blue_eyes tag.

Yes. Too much detail again.

I don't think a Flat Chest tag would be bad, a lot of other sites have that anyways.

Then again, I've also seen a tag named "What". So yeah.

loli

The mods will never agree to creating it. loli is enough.
I'd have had it up for merging on kona, but no one wants to add to the invisible posts.

nobodyshark said:
I don't think a Flat Chest tag would be bad, a lot of other sites have that anyways.

Then again, I've also seen a tag named "What". So yeah.

I like moe because it doesn't have complicated tags. Going into too much detail can be frustrating at times. Things like eye color, hair style, the resolution, or even as you say breasts sizes are sometimes hindering searches.

I support high resolution-tagging.
I see that as something useful in some cases.
In some cases only, so that might not be what the site mods have in mind.
They are more experienced and want the best for the site.
So it's better just to wait for their decisions.

Debbie said:
I support high resolution-tagging.

Say what?

spoilerSometimes, you are looking for a high-res picture. Is it to make a wallpaper, a banner, a calendar, anything you think of. But I usually use them the most to observe coloring techniques, which is an impossible task to pictures less than 1800 px big. No details, no big deal unfortunately.

spoilerAnd some artists have plenty of ~800 px images, since they always crop their pictures before posting on the net. That makes things harder. A high-res tag would be a way to give privilege to those pictures who are really worth the "high-res" nomination (I suppose, something like 2000 or 2500 px wider at least)

It's so sad most good artists damage their pictures before uploading onto their websites. A true shame.

This is one of the reasons why Danbooru got 6 times the number of pictures we have here (not to mention the poor art/scans uploaded there.)

You can use mpixels. For example: mpixels:<1

How does it work?
(I tried it, but I failed.)

I think that one is to filter for only the images with the height or width that are under 1000 pixel. I tried mpixels:>1 and only got images higher than 1000 pixels from height or width. Tried mpixels:>2 too.
EDIT: Nevermind, it's not exactly 1000. I don't know the calculations but I get some high-res image with mpixels:>2.

http://moe.imouto.org/help/cheatsheet

Radioactive said:
http://moe.imouto.org/help/cheatsheet

Ah, I get it now. Thanks. So it's a total from height*width.

Thanks! mpixels:>3 seems to work pretty great for me.
Man, this site never stops impressing me.

order:mpixels date:>2010-05-01 is also useful to search recent high resolutions.
btw, is there any way to search just png only?

ext:png

petopeto said:
ext:png

Must it be used with normal tags?

[edit]
I try to search ext:png kantoku, ext:png and so on, but sometimes it returnes nothing. The page count has issue as well.