Close
This post has a child post. (post #321971)

« Previous Next » This post is #238 in the Comic Kairakuten Covers pool.

Search
Tags
  • ? bosshi 264
  • ? comic kairakuten 729
  • ? cleavage 125831
  • ? erect nipples 38207
  • ? feet 49506
  • ? open shirt 104493
  • ? pantsu 169452
  • ? panty pull 32812
  • ? thighhighs 249786
  • ? underboob 14949
    • panties pantsuga underwear under boob soles pantypull torn thighhighs thighighs pantsu2 tighhighs panties under pantyhose thighhigh open kimono open clothes partially unbuttoned pink panties foot hold-ups black panties pink pantsu blue pantsu open cardigan pantsy thighboots thigh boots huge feet bow panties white panties white thighhighs foot focus red panties bikini bottom pull frilled panties visable panties panty peek blue panties orange panties single thighhigh lace panties open robe frilled thighhighs maid panties black thighhighs covered erect nipples panties aside
Options
Related Posts




bosshi cleavage comic_kairakuten erect_nipples feet open_shirt pantsu panty_pull thighhighs underboob

Edit | Respond

b923242
over 5 years ago
Just don't like the fact that the old one change a lot of color of the original image. Maybe someone will think the old one is better tho. Feel free to judge, del and let me know which one is better
Radioactive
over 5 years ago
The colour change is odd, but the quality is better. Is this an digital release?
b923242
over 5 years ago
This is a scan version of the magazine + Photoshop. Which one you mean that that colour is odd? (I do had a DL ver cover of this, but that a FAKKU ver [a eng publisher ver which include few design change and eng translation]) I can post that as well if anyone want.
If my post edit works quality is acceptable, I will try to post more high res edited magazine cover.
Radioactive
over 5 years ago
The magazine logo is either blue or purple depending on which scan you look at. As for scan quality, I'll let the experts comment on that.
fireattack
over 5 years ago
The old one is just scanned/processed poorly. Color is off, and it's blurry. We can keep both for now
b923242
over 5 years ago
fireattack said:
The old one is just scanned/processed poorly. Color is off, and it's blurry. We can keep both for now
You mean the old one is off and blurry? If it is I will keep my editing style
Radioactive
over 5 years ago
b923242 said:
You mean the old one is off and blurry? If it is I will keep my editing style
That's correct. Your scan is better.
fireattack
over 5 years ago
By "off" I mean its colors are kinda clipped and the contrast is too high. Can't really comment on the color accuracy without seeing what it is supposed to be.