mizuki yuuma timepiece ensemble yanagibashi saori yushima towako ass cream naked nipples symmetrical docking valentine wallpaper | #526102 | yande.re

Try clearing out cookies of you have problem logging in/out.

Close

This image has been resized. Click on the View larger version link in the sidebar for a high-quality version. Hide this message.

Image samples have been disabled. If you find this to be too slow, you can turn samples back on in your profile settings.

This post has child posts. (post #526104, 526106, 526107)

ass cream mizuki_yuuma naked nipples symmetrical_docking timepiece_ensemble valentine wallpaper yanagibashi_saori yushima_towako

Edit | Respond

moonian

over 5 years ago

@john.doe & edogawaconan: No wallpaper for non-standard dimensions.

fireattack

over 5 years ago

3840x2400 IS standard dimension.

Radioactive

over 5 years ago

fireattack said:
3840x2400 IS standard dimension.

Apparently it's not quite an standard.

fireattack

over 5 years ago

Common? No, but that's the standard (or I should say "typical") 4k 16:10 resolution, WQUXGA.

Radioactive

over 5 years ago

fireattack said:
Common? No, but that's the standard (or I should say "typical") 4k 16:10 resolution, WQUXGA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_resolution#/media/File:Vector_Video_Standards8.svg we should stick with common standards for wallpapers. How does danbooru deal with that resolution tagging wise?

Genex

over 5 years ago

fireattack said:
3840x2400 IS standard dimension.

It's also called "3840x2400 Retina Wide", so maybe a standard there.

moonian

over 5 years ago

Well, if this is 16:10, then I think it's OK (just like 1920x1200).

Sorry for any confusion caused.

P.S. Added back wallpaper to the other child post having the same demensions.

fireattack

over 5 years ago

Radioactive said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_resolution#/media/File:Vector_Video_Standards8.svg we should stick with common standards for wallpapers. How does danbooru deal with that resolution tagging wise?

This graph doesn't seem to be comprehensive. Check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_display_resolution for more info about this topic.

Radioactive

over 5 years ago

fireattack said:
This graph doesn't seem to be comprehensive. Check https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_display_resolution for more info about this topic.

Thanks. So that resolution hasn't really been used since the early 2000's?