Reverse camel toe. LOL.

Thorcsf said:
Reverse camel toe. LOL.

What do you mean? It look like just regular ass, imo.

Eighter said:
What do you mean? It look like just regular ass, imo.

While the camel toe is when the garment slightly penetrates the labia, creating a crease, in this picture the shorts are penetrating the ass, not the labia, hence, "reverse camel toe". :P

Mash, it's not see through, the shorts are opaque and there's no visible panty in the picture that asks for a tag. What you see are the edges of the panty marking on the shorts.

I think it's not allowed to comment twice in a short period of time.

Thorcf, is it really called so? Prominent underwear edges is so quite common and casual thing, that I could hardly imagine someone fetishizes this and give it a special name.

RyuZU said:
I think it's not allowed to comment twice in a short period of time.

please..

Nepcoheart said:
please..

Yeah? I mean, comment 2 times in a row without someone having answered the first comment.

Eighter said:
Thorcf, is it really called so? Prominent underwear edges is so quite common and casual thing, that I could hardly imagine someone fetishizes this and give it a special name.

It's called panty line.

RyuZU said:
Yeah? I mean, comment 2 times in a row without someone having answered the first comment.

other things are supposed not allowed here but oh well

Eighter said:
Thorcf, is it really called so? Prominent underwear edges is so quite common and casual thing, that I could hardly imagine someone fetishizes this and give it a special name.

OMG! I was not talking about that when I said "reverse camel toe"! Haha! I was talking about the shorts penetrating the buttocks. It was just a joke, man! You are taking it too seriously! The "panty lines" (thank you, edogawaconan) had nothing to do with my first comment. :P

Nepcoheart said:
please..

Yeah, right? Haha!

RyuZU, it was two different comments about two different subjects directed to two different persons in response to two different actions (the second comment regarding Mash's insistence to tag the post with see_through and pantsu (see post history)), hence two separate comments. ;)