Close
This post was deleted. Reason: revision. MD5: f906b24bc98909d0aa0756c886fd0c02
This post belongs to a parent post.
Search
Tags
  • ? tamano kedama 495
  • ? bra 66411
  • ? breast hold 40124
  • ? breasts 96706
  • ? cum 40333
  • ? duplicate 1155
  • ? maid 36413
  • ? nipples 190491
  • ? pantsu 171360
  • ? pussy 111377
  • ? see through 74325
  • ? skirt lift 111384
  • ? stockings 41851
  • ? tagme 42681
  • ? thighhighs 252169
  • ? vibrator 4319
    • panties vulva see-through pantsuga breast underwear nipple torn thighhighs dupe kedama milk thighighs artist request big breasts small breasts medium breasts huge breasts pantsu2 large breasts tighhighs panties under pantyhose tagme artist thighhigh tagme (character) clitoris tagme (artist) spread pussy pink bra pink panties semen nakadashi ejaculation creaming cumming tag me hold-ups black panties cervix pussy pils lace bra pink pantsu blue pantsu bra strap boobs pantsy thighboots /dress up/ dress up vagina tegme thigh boots cum inside holding skirt black bra cum on face sports bra cumdrip nipple vibrator cum on breasts cum on upper body cum on body dress lift bow panties white panties white thighhighs red panties wet pussy frilled panties visable panties panty peek holding breast inverted nipple cum on hair cum in pussy plump pussy blue panties orange panties single thighhigh puffy nipples sockings pixel-perfect duplicate strapless bra lace panties white bra artist needed frilled thighhighs maid panties black thighhighs egg vibrator semen string cum in ass semen in mouth semen on hair semen on tongue
Statistics
Options
Related Posts




Edit | Respond

kotorilau
over 5 years ago
Are you kidding me with this reason for deletion?
moonian
over 5 years ago
kotorilau said:
Are you kidding me with this reason for deletion?
If there exists a Pixiv counterpart, the version from twitter (where images uploaded usually have their quality got lowered) will be removed.
kotorilau
over 5 years ago
moonian said:
If there exists a Pixiv counterpart, the version from twitter (where images uploaded usually have their quality got lowered) will be removed.
Is that a new rule in this website?
kotorilau
over 5 years ago
Since I found that there is lots of images which keep both versions, they still even no flagged for deletion.
blooregardo
over 5 years ago
That's probably because we haven't looked into it, or there is some variation between versions. You see, Twitter downgrades the image by reducing its size adding a bit of JPEG artifacts, lowering the quality.
kotorilau
over 5 years ago
blooregardo said:
That's probably because we haven't looked into it, or there is some variation between versions. You see, Twitter downgrades the image by reducing its size adding a bit of JPEG artifacts, lowering the quality.
ok~ :)
Nepcoheart
over 5 years ago
The correct thing would be to say "duplicate" but well, it is also assumed that according to a site rule, duplicates carry that tag and then they are checked for deletion or not later, but they are not flagged to delete
kotorilau
over 5 years ago
Nepcoheart said:
The correct thing would be to say "duplicate" but well, it is also assumed that according to a site rule, duplicates carry that tag and then they are checked for deletion or not later, but they are not flagged to delete
Yup. According to the description of 'duplicate', it mentioned that we no need to flag duplicates for deletion. A mod will routinely go through the duplicate tag and delete the duplicates.
kotorilau
over 5 years ago
Now I add up the 'duplicate' tag.