This post belongs to a parent post.
|
|
Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
|
|
MDGeist
almost 16 years agoguess scan quality is also hugely dependand on paper quality, as the dina3 image simply sucks mayor balls...
Radioactive
almost 16 years agoThere is some dirt on the scan you should touch-up post-scan.
MDGeist
almost 16 years agoRadioactive
almost 16 years agomidzki
almost 16 years agoif scan has blured edges and no noise, lanczos3 will be best.
but it has noise, lanczos enhances noise. bilinear or bicubic smoother will work in this case.
p.s.
don't use lanczos on gimp because of its bad quality. it may be something broken.