This image has been resized. Click on the View larger version link in the sidebar for a high-quality version.
Hide this message.
Image samples have been disabled. If you find this to be too slow, you can turn samples back on in your profile settings.
This post has a child post. (post #66669)
Search
Tags
Statistics
- Id: 66673
- Posted: about 9 years ago by midzki
- Size: 2365x2973
- Rating: Explicit
- Score: 42
- Favorited by: PartsNinja, COMETOSEE, Azarel, chlwodud, black_snow, makiechang, lonelyg, Lumishare, daedalus25, ditama, Kalessin, yxl02, Thomas_Hartman, kitt18, jikj0730, movement, lastone13, amonre, AimClickKill, Rienfleche, Meimei, omgsatan, Fridzouille, amonrei, Yutaka, fil27, Shannaro, kkendd, Riven, takezo, akirawen, amethystarry (26 more)
midzki
about 9 years agoresized 800dpi at 400dpi.
maybe color adjustment isn't best yet :(
edit:
I have to redo color adjustment tommorow. jpeg messed up color histogram, and my eyes are sleepy... >_<
midzki
about 9 years agoeven though those visible quality is horrible, but potential quality is enough high :)
Radioactive
about 9 years agoLow-res/low-quality scans we need for the wiki should (hopefully) be flagged with with 'wiki' but what about this kind of scan? Use RAW as a (fault) tag if someone is actually processing it?
It raises a few awkward questions.
midzki
about 9 years agoif there arn't raws, my try is meaningless >_<
=D
Radioactive
about 9 years ago