Close
This post has a child post. (post #664376)
Search
Tags
  • ? azto dio 850
  • ? arknights 15343
  • ? nian (arknights) 378
  • ? breasts 95671
  • ? horns 54945
  • ? kimono 10857
  • ? nipples 188574
  • ? no bra 187690
  • ? nopan 50350
  • ? open shirt 104727
  • ? pointy ears 44233
  • ? sex 33446
    • no pan breast no panties nipple nobra big breasts small breasts medium breasts huge breasts large breasts open kimono pink kimono open clothes partially unbuttoned clothed sex missionary position outdoor sex rape open cardigan boobs no pants pointed ears sex from behind rough sex long horns inverted nipple puffy nipples open robe green kimono dragon horns demon horns
Statistics
Options
Related Posts




arknights azto_dio breasts horns kimono nian_(arknights) nipples no_bra nopan open_shirt pointy_ears sex

Edit | Respond

Darkthought75
over 4 years ago
I put explicit rating and "sex" tag despite no details shown, just to be safe. Change it if needed.
moonian
over 4 years ago
Darkthought75 said:
I put explicit rating and "sex" tag despite no details shown, just to be safe. Change it if needed.
I too think it's correct to assume the genital insertion really exists here.
Thorcsf
over 4 years ago
I think it could be rated as questionable, because as far as we can tell, she could be just sitting on him, and we can't see any genitals.
fbhou
over 4 years ago
No penis/vagina shown, I suggest rating it as questionable, as it's just a kind of sexual suggestion (maybe a little strange though).
moonian
over 4 years ago
fbhou said:
No penis/vagina shown, I suggest rating it as questionable, as it's just a kind of sexual suggestion (maybe a little strange though).
Unless it's determined they aren't actually having sex (i.e. have the "sex" tag removed), this post must be Explicit (refer to howto:rate for more).
Thorcsf
over 4 years ago
moonian said:
Unless it's determined they aren't actually having sex (i.e. have the "sex" tag removed), this post must be Explicit (refer to howto:rate for more).
That's exactly what I and fbhou mean, remove the "sex" tag. They *could* be having sex, but we can't actually see anything, so if we can't see, we can't prove that it's happening. As I said, she could just be sitting on him.
Darkthought75
over 4 years ago
Thorcsf said:
we can't prove that it's happening
But we can't prove its not happening either xD

Maybe we need to make a "Implied sex" tag?
moonian
over 4 years ago
Darkthought75 said:

Maybe we need to make a "Implied sex" tag?
Nope, that's also a subjective tag.
Thorcsf
over 4 years ago
Darkthought75 said:
But we can't prove its not happening either xD
Exactly. That's why we only tag things that are actually visible in the picture, not subjective things. The "sex" is subjective in this picture. I'd remove the tag and rate it as questionable, but I will leave it up to you and the mod. :)

P.S. Sorry to bring this topic back up again after a week. I checked the following day for answers and there wasn't any, so I forgot about it. I saw this picture again just now and went to check if there were answers, and it turned out there were. :)