This post was deleted.
Reason: Replaced . MD5: c57fa6da6bde46d241e4c6c08b9b5f28
This post belongs to a parent post.
|
Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
|
Spidey
almost 4 years ago1.- Mods told me that there was no need to replace an image when its resolution or details' variation was minimal, so, it feels a little confusing to have mine flagged. And..
2.- Wasn't it that we shouln't flag posts but tag them as duplicate? Because if this is the case and other user will keep on flagging, I might as well do the same, since there are plenty of posts in a similar situation.
All the same, I'll do as the mods recommend, so, I'd really appreciate some light on this topic.
乐观的食用盐
almost 4 years ago1. The first filesize is 409KB, apparently doubled from another one (201KB). Both file are conpressed as jpeg format, but their rasterize method seems to be a little bit diffrent. Though I can't see anything further by the filesize, but this gave me a way to vertify my point (later).
2. By minusing them together and after brightness adjustment, I got a lights-diffrence-graphic between them (should a upload it?). It shows clearly that these two picture has no difference in painting detail aspect. Because there are only tiny noises, and they focus especially place with high contrast ratio, like the breast and body line.
3. The way I have mentioned is quite simple too. You need a twitter account and a pixiv account, then upload a picture by yourself. Then download it in two site, and compare them as I've done. Give me the histogram, then I can submit a detailed statistical report of the difference of two rasterize method. If it shows nothing, then maybe only the artist himself knows why the hell are those noises exist indeed.
4. I'm gonna bed!!!
Hope these conclusion helps.
乐观的食用盐
almost 4 years ago