@moonian

Based on the background this is obviously meant to be a wedding attire and if among many others these were accepted as wedding dresses, than so should be this:

post #653963
post #533989
post #530530
post #485435
post #807044
post #741905
post #726124
post #726122
post #790163

dick_dickinson said:
@moonian

Based on the background this is obviously meant to be a wedding attire and if among many others these were accepted as wedding dresses, than so should be this:

post #653963
post #533989
post #530530
post #485435
post #807044
post #741905
post #726124
post #726122
post #790163

You need to be a one-piece to be qualified to be a dress in the first place (and wedding_dress is, of course, a dress). This one obviously isn't.

Other elements of wedding attire should be tagged with their own ones (e.g. "bridal_gauntlets", "veil", etc.), but we don't have those tags here.

I'm going to remove those tags from those you've quoted that aren't qualified. (e.g. Some of them listed only contain a veil, but for some reason also got tagged with that)

P.S. To all - refer to the "Skirts vs Dresses" bit: https://danbooru.donmai.us/wiki_pages/dress

moonian said:
I'm going to remove those tags from those you've quoted that aren't qualified.

Then go through all the posts tagged with wedding dress and fix everything or go easy on yourself and leave them and also this as wedding dress.

Also, two piece wedding "dresses" exist.

dick_dickinson said:
Then go through all the posts tagged with wedding dress and fix everything

This is what I've been exactly doing whenever I've encountered something that's not a dress.

or go easy on yourself and leave them and also this as wedding dress.

Sorry, but I don't think I will do that :D

Also, two piece wedding "dresses" exist.

That's not "exist", but just they "redefine" the term "dress" themselves (in reality, it's called "blouse + skirt").

moonian said:
That's not "exist", but just they "redefine" the term "dress" themselves (in reality, it's called "blouse + skirt").

"open shirt" - every single article of open, partially open or sometimes not open clothing
"wedding dress" - the literal dictionary definition of dress, but for wedding

Edit: What I mean, that you happily redefine the shirt part of open_shirt, the suit part of business_suit, the uniform part of gym_uniform, then you argue that two piece wedding attire can't be wedding dress, because a dress can't be two piece.

dick_dickinson said:
"open shirt"

Tell that to the user that decided to use the tag "open_shirt" instead of "open_clothes" ages ago (i.e. not me) about that - all I've been doing is just following how the wiki defines tags.

I just pointed out, that arguing what the definitions of certain words don't make much sense when the usage/definition of tags are consistently inconsistent.

Also, making an argument with wiki definitions when a certain someone updated a wiki definition just about two months ago aren't all that convincing. Wiki definitions obviously aren't set in stone.

Also again, a lot of things happened since "ages ago". Like for example yande.re threw out its tagging system to have the current crippled one, while a lot of rules changed without the rule changes being communicated anywhere. I sometimes feel like the forum is only there so the staff (except you, you do work a lot) can explain why they don't do and don't even intend to do anything (for example the most basic stuff like posting rule changes).