Close
Search
Tags
  • ? hiroyama hiroshi 59
  • ? fate/kaleid liner prisma illya 1980
  • ? fate/stay night 9956
  • ? illyasviel von einzbern 1637
  • ? ass 103679
  • ? loli 50576
  • ? nipples 180493
  • ? pantsu 162636
  • ? photoshop 6643
  • ? tan lines 5276
  • ? topless 23472
    • panties fate stay night pantsuga underwear tanlines tanline nipple pantsu2 panties under pantyhose ass visible through thighs pink panties big ass loli nude black panties pink pantsu blue pantsu pantsy ass focus presenting ass one-piece tan third-party edit bow panties white panties red panties huge ass frilled panties visable panties panty peek third party edit inverted nipple blue panties orange panties puffy nipples lace panties photoshop (medium) bikini tan maid panties
Options
Related Posts




ass fate/kaleid_liner_prisma_illya fate/stay_night hiroyama_hiroshi illyasviel_von_einzbern loli nipples pantsu photoshop tan_lines topless

Edit | Respond

Arknovalisk
about 2 years ago
Fake marketing, stupid questionnaire...what an illustration.
otakusheep
about 2 years ago
I gotta go with ball sack instead of labia on this one. It doesn't say it, but I think she's a trap. A GREAT-looking trap, but a trap.
Marona762
about 2 years ago
Arknovalisk said:
Are you blind?
Another comment poking against another user, do you have thing for being antagonist?
Arknovalisk
about 2 years ago
You are the one who loves going off-topic and randomly attack a user who you have a beef with.
What I asked makes perfect sense. He claims it's a trap, when clearly there are no indication of something like a ballsack like he states, and the character is a well-known character, who he can check is a female, so my question at his direction IS very much warranted, unlike you calling me out.
otakusheep
about 2 years ago
Arknovalisk said:
You are the one who loves going off-topic and randomly attack a user who you have a beef with.
What I asked makes perfect sense. He claims it's a trap, when clearly there are no indication of something like a ball sack like he states, and the character is a well-known character, who he can check is a female, so my question at his direction IS very much warranted, unlike you calling me out.
Your choice of words lends to the fact that you're somewhat immature and judgmental.
you could have just asked why I thought that, and I would have explained. The character matters not when viewing any artists interpretation of a character/image.
Arknovalisk
about 2 years ago
otakusheep said:
Your choice of words lends to the fact that you're somewhat immature and judgmental.
you could have just asked why I thought that, and I would have explained. The character matters not when viewing any artists interpretation of a character/image.
Leaving aside the personal parts (you know I just used a common phrase to make my point), when the artist is well known, responsible for official art of the series (this picture is photoshopped official art too), specializes and likes to draw girls and not traps, and lastly, there's no place for a ballsack to fit there like I said, I think you should admit that your take was not justified, and there's nothing up to debate about this topic.
Marona762
about 2 years ago
Arknovalisk said: When the artist is well known, responsible for official art of the series (this picture is photoshopped official art too), specializes and likes to draw girls and not traps,
-- This whole argument stands on the premise that the person you're addressing is aware of the information you're saying is "Well known"; If it's not the case, then this argument is invalid (yes people have the right to not know the author behind a picture and still have an opinion / view over an individual picture)

Arknovalisk said:
and lastly, there's no place for a ballsack to fit there like I said
That's debatable, there's a very small bulge there, I wouldn't say there's (or there isn't) definitely one, not for sure at least (There's girls with very small breasts so there may as well be boys or traps with very small ballsack).

It's an impression, and you can't really argue with an impression without solid proof( = it's a point of view).
(And it's not really worth debating something like this really who cares...)
otakusheep
about 2 years ago
Marona762 said:
-- This whole argument stands on the premise that the person you're addressing is aware of the information you're saying is "Well known"; If it's not the case, then this argument is invalid (yes people have the right to not know the author behind a picture and still have an opinion / view over an individual picture)

That's debatable, there's a very small bulge there, I wouldn't say there's (or there isn't) definitely one, not for sure at least (There's girls with very small breasts so there may as well be boys or traps with very small ballsack).

It's an impression, and you can't really argue with an impression without solid proof( = it's a point of view).
(And it's not really worth debating something like this really who cares...)
Agreed. I'm just saying I think that's a lot of low-hanging labia.