Close
This post has a child post. (post #970500)
Search
Tags
  • ? yoshio (55level) 488
  • ? areola 20341
  • ? bikini 91117
  • ? erect nipples 38435
  • ? swimsuits 129979
    • swimsuit swim suit mizugi blue bikini green swimsuit rosalina bikini green bikini side-tie bikini black swimsuit tankini iguana bikini lovely bikini areolae bikini skirt string bikini bikini shorts dracula bikini black bikini kirarin bikini areola slip micro bikini bikini bottom blue swimsuit purple bikini red bikini maid bikini competition swimsuits cow print bikini layered bikini large areolae wet swimsuit puffy areolae one-piece swimsuit yellow bikini competition swimsuit highleg swimsuit frilled bikini strapless bikini big areola sports bikini two-tone bikini covered erect nipples cow bikini
Options
Related Posts




areola bikini erect_nipples swimsuits yoshio_(55level)

Edit | Respond

Genex
over 2 years ago
Which takes priority, Image Size or Image Quality?

The Twitter image is 4096, but 85 quality. The Pixiv image is 2048, but Image Quality is 100.

Which would stay?
blooregardo
over 2 years ago
Quality is the most important factor but size is potential quality (as in a mid quality image downsized to a size not as small can still present a similar quality) so it's best to keep both.
Genex
over 2 years ago
Okay, sounds reasonable. I'll hold both. Wasn't sure of the policy here, so thanks for clearing that up.

Update: Being as both are jpegs, the larger one has the better quality as far as edge artifacts go. So I might skip posting the smaller jpeg. Someone else is free to, but one is enough.
fatmangoth
over 2 years ago
The smaller image looks hella noised, no way he would get those artifacts after downscaling this image and saving to 100 jpeg. It looks re-encoded a couple of times, so I suggest to delete smaller one, as a reminder that 100 jpeg is not lossless and significantly increases file size.
Genex
over 2 years ago
Thanks for the input, fatmangoth. I like the larger size image in this case, too.