The child post is marked as safe, this one as questionable, which is it?

Boobage is questionable

blooregardo said:
Boobage is questionable

You're condemning a strapless dress as questionable content.

yrumddldluxduzrf said:
You're condemning a strapless dress as questionable content.

Only if the breasts are large ad in focus

blooregardo said:
Only if the breasts are large ad in focus

Would the following posts: post #409357, post #411039, post #411061, post #411031, post #400909, post #394109, post #362383, post #362368, post #362366, post #316076, post #258077, post #240077, post #207406, post #206615 --perhaps cast any doubt on that? People responsible for rating:s in there are fireattack and moonian.

Found a post #215095.as an easter egg.

yrumddldluxduzrf said:
Would the following posts: post #409357, post #411039, post #411061, post #411031, post #400909, post #394109, post #362383, post #362368, post #362366, post #316076, post #258077, post #240077, post #207406, post #206615 --perhaps cast any doubt on that? People responsible for rating:s in there are fireattack and moonian.

Found a post #215095.as an easter egg.

I guess some people just don't have sensual IQ. Those pictures are safe for a reason. This one is questionable for a good reason too. If you don't see those, maybe take some art classes, though not sure what could help, when the difference is obvious to almost everyone.

Arknovalisk said:
I guess some people just don't have sensual IQ. Those pictures are safe for a reason. This one is questionable for a good reason too. If you don't see those, maybe take some art classes, though not sure what could help, when the difference is obvious to almost everyone.

In case I'm mistaken in my assessment of this gem of a situation, I'll try to leave the s/q-ratings be, unless stuff like cameltoes on "safe" posts.happens, or unless current paradigm shifts.
Thanks for posting what you posted.

Arknovalisk said:
I guess some people just don't have sensual IQ. Those pictures are safe for a reason. This one is questionable for a good reason too. If you don't see those, maybe take some art classes, though not sure what could help, when the difference is obvious to almost everyone.

I've just run into news that danbooru and gelbooru are implementing a "general" rating. That one must be what some people here are trying to shoehorn yande.re "safe" into.

yrumddldluxduzrf said:
I've just run into news that danbooru and gelbooru are implementing a "general" rating. That one must be what some people here are trying to shoehorn yande.re "safe" into.

Saw that. Gelbooru is just following Danbooru’s decisions, as usual.

Well, for what I have understood, “General” would be for totally unquestionable safe contents, “Sensitive” for the “safest” NSFW contents (deep cleavages, swimsuits/bikinis, bunnygirls and other erotic poses), and “Questionable”/“Explicit” would remain unchanged.

Does Yande.re need to align with these others sites? This is not an obligation: they do what they want, they never asked for other *boorus to imitate them. And what about Konachan?

The rating policy is:
Safe - Images you'd show to your mom
Questionable - Images you wouldn't show your mom
Explicit - Images your mom would kick you up for
(okay I made up that last one)

I mean a more granular rating perhaps is better, but I won't hold my breath about us implementing that any soon lol.

I do agree "general" is better term than "safe" though, regardless if we're going to add "sensitive". People read safe as "safe for work", which is often a stricter criterion than what we have now.