Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
Considering: -Most of the content on the last years is digital art from Pixiv and others -The Pixiv maid's contest brought a lot of smaller resolution images for the last weeks, and the user Ferkunxd uploaded a lot of images at the same time. If there was a "recent influx", it was just that. -But that recent influx proves that a lot of good stuff would stay out with a strict resolution limit -While having standards is good, the industry is no better than before -Such measures disencourage user contribution -It's not even easy to comply since it's a proportion, an extra field for MP size on post information should be implemented. -If mods and scans are exempt from this rule, that would make it inconsistent (maybe one of the most inconsistent of all our rules), lessening the image of the board. -etc It's a bad move that apparently pretends to keep the site's standards but it's mostly a way to have less "work" managing the site.
blooregardo
-Most of the content on the last years is digital art from Pixiv and others
-The Pixiv maid's contest brought a lot of smaller resolution images for the last weeks, and the user Ferkunxd uploaded a lot of images at the same time. If there was a "recent influx", it was just that.
-But that recent influx proves that a lot of good stuff would stay out with a strict resolution limit
-While having standards is good, the industry is no better than before
-Such measures disencourage user contribution
-It's not even easy to comply since it's a proportion, an extra field for MP size on post information should be implemented.
-If mods and scans are exempt from this rule, that would make it inconsistent (maybe one of the most inconsistent of all our rules), lessening the image of the board.
-etc
It's a bad move that apparently pretends to keep the site's standards but it's mostly a way to have less "work" managing the site.