Close
found this via searching something completely unrelated...so much for relevant results.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Blake_Ashforth/publication/233729899_Social_Identity_Theory_and_Organization/links/583c91ee08ae502a85e3e966/Social-Identity-Theory-and-Organization.pdf

Ashforth & Mael, Social Identity Theory and The Organization, Academy of Management Review

Abstract

It is argued that (a) social identification is a perception of oneness with a group of persons; (b) social identification stems from the categorization of individuals, the distinctiveness and prestige of the group, the salience of outgroups, and the factors that traditionally are associated with group formation; and (c) social identification leads to activities that are congruent with the identity, support for institutions that embody the identity, stereotypical perceptions of self and others, and outcomes that traditionally are associated with group formation, and it reinforces the antecedents of identification. This perspective is applied to organizational socialization, role conflict, and intergroup relations.

Also, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure_and_agency ; life and all the power struggles.

Also, what is statistically normal, or is it all in our heads? What makes good news, and what sells? Coverage/sampling bias, transmission distortions, and receiver acceptance...