Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
Velen said: Like I said, if you zoom in on shape layers, they appear pixelated. It's one of the blatant drawbacks of using Photoshop, a raster graphic editing program, for vectors. It does have vectoring capabilities, but not all the features that Illustrator and Inkscape do. To get the top one to look like the bottom, you have to resize it up instead of zooming in.
More like vector capabilities, I would consider that re-trace capabilities. Photoshop itself goes against the definition of vector graphics
Raster-based image editors, such as Photoshop and GIMP, revolve around editing pixels, unlike vector-based image editors, such as CorelDRAW, Adobe Illustrator, or Inkscape, which revolve around editing lines and shapes (vectors).
Shuugo