Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
I'm not sure what you're complaining about. We've had minor general tagging like that for a long time (mostly maintained by vistigris, though we've had a few other people going at it lately).
There's no problem with these tags, as long as a couple things are met:
- uploaders are not expected to use them; - they're well-maintained by the people who do use them.
The first avoids the major problem with Danbooru tagging: if you want to upload on Danbooru, you're expected to learn a million tags and to use them all. (Maybe not, but that's the sense I get.) The only tags I expect posters to use here are the primary blacklisting tags (male, etc.), and artist/circle tags if you know them. After all, the focus here is on the art, not the metadata, and we don't want to drive away posters because they don't want to be bothered with tags.
The second avoids the problem with casually using general tags: it's useless to have a descriptive tag if it's not applied reasonably consistently, and it just makes the site look poorly maintained.
As long as these two things are met, I don't see a problem with general tagging, as long as the tags have some reasonable use and there are people willing to maintain the tags.
What's a reasonable use? Simple: whether people actually want to search for them. I'm sure people search for "pantsu" and "breasts" all the time. Nobody would use a tag "four_girls_two_guys_and_a_pretzel", so I'd probably object to that tag even if someone did maintain it.
(Some tags I've never really understood--for example, why we have shimapan if we don't have red_panties, white_panties, etc., but it doesn't bother me.)
If you don't need the tags, just ignore them; they're not doing you any harm.
petopeto
There's no problem with these tags, as long as a couple things are met:
- uploaders are not expected to use them;
- they're well-maintained by the people who do use them.
The first avoids the major problem with Danbooru tagging: if you want to upload on Danbooru, you're expected to learn a million tags and to use them all. (Maybe not, but that's the sense I get.) The only tags I expect posters to use here are the primary blacklisting tags (male, etc.), and artist/circle tags if you know them. After all, the focus here is on the art, not the metadata, and we don't want to drive away posters because they don't want to be bothered with tags.
The second avoids the problem with casually using general tags: it's useless to have a descriptive tag if it's not applied reasonably consistently, and it just makes the site look poorly maintained.
As long as these two things are met, I don't see a problem with general tagging, as long as the tags have some reasonable use and there are people willing to maintain the tags.
What's a reasonable use? Simple: whether people actually want to search for them. I'm sure people search for "pantsu" and "breasts" all the time. Nobody would use a tag "four_girls_two_guys_and_a_pretzel", so I'd probably object to that tag even if someone did maintain it.
(Some tags I've never really understood--for example, why we have shimapan if we don't have red_panties, white_panties, etc., but it doesn't bother me.)
If you don't need the tags, just ignore them; they're not doing you any harm.