Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
natsumenatsu said: no azd... i only read the forget the whole thing part.. which is rude...
anyways... i'm just playing with you shio chan...
your statements are correct if you're looking it as a paraconsistent logic point of view...
although the answer i'm looking for the question whether i'm a liar or not... is neither... which is the bivalent point of view...
both views have loopholes in it... and that is why this is a paradoxial question...
kind of like saying... every statement has an exception... then an exception for this statement is that there isn't an exception for statements...
well... one more strike and i'm out...
hahaha oh i love this (thanks for the game i guess?)! <i hadn't done this in a while...and i think it's fun...when people are open <which is very rare> to other points of view and to "dialog" <even if they are not correct/cannot be proved/etc...cause in the end "all is relative" <the easy way out> lol...but hey, we are biased humans that will <probably> never be able to see the whole picture "as is" so changing "glasses" <perspectives> and "upgrading"/"testing" them is fun>.
about the "every statement..." (the way i've heard it is more like "for every rule there is an exception") i would simply (cheaply>.<) solve it by saying "most statements have an exception". But i guess paradoxes are no longer to be dealt with pure logic, but philosophy...(we've found imaginary numbers to fill some holes on mathematics...so we might as well find something to fill these ones as well)
so, is the psychology study already in planning or is it just a future goal for now? (what about philosophy, would you be interested in that too? and why psychology?)
ToshioTV
about the "every statement..." (the way i've heard it is more like "for every rule there is an exception") i would simply (cheaply>.<) solve it by saying "most statements have an exception". But i guess paradoxes are no longer to be dealt with pure logic, but philosophy...(we've found imaginary numbers to fill some holes on mathematics...so we might as well find something to fill these ones as well)
so, is the psychology study already in planning or is it just a future goal for now? (what about philosophy, would you be interested in that too? and why psychology?)