Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
This user name doesn't exist. If you want to create a new account, just verify your password and log in.
This user name exists. If you want to create a new account, please choose a different name.
Enter the current email address you have registered in your profile. You'll get an email containing your new password.
You have no email address in your profile, so you can't have your password reset.
Password reset. Check your email in a few minutes
That account does not exist.
The email address specified is not registered with this account.
Delivery to this email address has failed.
syaoran-kun said: Also about the "artist permission" stuff, i'm just gonna say the usual. "You posted it on the internet? Then let people enjoy it and don't cause pointless credit drama".
I must agree, Syaoran-kun. My criteria for deviantART and Pixiv images are the exact same of scanned images: Beauty, quality, idea, purpose, and artist style.
Beauty - Is this picture beautiful? Cute? Moe? Whatever? Do you like looking at it? Would you download it, or no, too atrocious for your computer? The art may not be that good, but it may be cute and attractive in some ways.
Quality - The effects of coloring, the lineart arrange, the techniques. In other words, the experience of the artist, and the effort he/she put on his/her art piece.
Idea - Funny? Disturbing? Is this picture different, new, creative in any way? In case of fan art, is the situation created for the depicted characters cool and attaching by any chance?
Purpose - Why was this picture created for? Moe? Fan service? To impress? To shock? To disgust? What is it doing here? Do people here like this purpose? Does the quality of the illustration fit this purpose?
Artist style - Does this artist have a great style? Is it well-developed? Is it at least developed enough? Is it a bit poorly-drawn, but yet original and pretty? This part is a bit hard, people think very differently about styles.
What I'd like to make clear - Images shouldn't be judged by where they come from, and yes by what they are. Images are still images. The same quality criteria applied to scans should be applied to ODA.
This is what I think about it. Hope it helps. And sorry for the long boring comment. I'm terrible on making things short.
Debbie
My criteria for deviantART and Pixiv images are the exact same of scanned images: Beauty, quality, idea, purpose, and artist style.
Beauty - Is this picture beautiful? Cute? Moe? Whatever? Do you like looking at it? Would you download it, or no, too atrocious for your computer? The art may not be that good, but it may be cute and attractive in some ways.
Quality - The effects of coloring, the lineart arrange, the techniques. In other words, the experience of the artist, and the effort he/she put on his/her art piece.
Idea - Funny? Disturbing? Is this picture different, new, creative in any way? In case of fan art, is the situation created for the depicted characters cool and attaching by any chance?
Purpose - Why was this picture created for? Moe? Fan service? To impress? To shock? To disgust? What is it doing here? Do people here like this purpose? Does the quality of the illustration fit this purpose?
Artist style - Does this artist have a great style? Is it well-developed? Is it at least developed enough? Is it a bit poorly-drawn, but yet original and pretty? This part is a bit hard, people think very differently about styles.
What I'd like to make clear - Images shouldn't be judged by where they come from, and yes by what they are. Images are still images. The same quality criteria applied to scans should be applied to ODA.
This is what I think about it. Hope it helps. And sorry for the long boring comment. I'm terrible on making things short.