this is a page edited by the scanner, not part of the doujinshi, which has only 30 pages
https://www.melonbooks.co.jp/detail/detail.php?product_id=1571471

Okay, removed it from the pool.

It is not recommended to remove this page. It is the request of the original uploader.

分流需转载尾页Instrumental Demonstration Series宣传图

v9Pb1 said:
It is not recommended to remove this page. It is the request of the original uploader.

There's no obligation to follow irrational third-party requests like this one - if the original book does NOT have that page, don't add it to the book's pool.

They literally just used a random illustration and added some watermark on it lol.

Why was it deleted as "watermarked dupe"?
The ones we have had a lower res then this one.
2896x4096 vs 1131x1600

Pls undelete

BattlequeenYume said:
Why was it deleted as "watermarked dupe"?
The ones we have had a lower res then this one.
2896x4096 vs 1131x1600

Pls undelete

The watermarks are probably added by that third-party uploader unrelated to the artwork's artist?

Then the deletion reason is clearly wrong. No wonder I got confused.

See watermark.

That was not the problem here, Arsy.
The deletion reason should be "third-party-watermark" and not watermarked dupe - bc this is wrong and the thing that confused me.

Okay... the watermark is to express that the artbook was fixed by the uploader (lnstrumental@EH) with lots of effort, to make it close to the original image, and actually it did.

moonian said:

If there is no way to take it back, a mark on the description like "uploaded by lnstrumental" is also appreciated. Hope the creater of the pool would leave a source at the description.

v9Pb1 said:
Okay... the watermark is to express that the artbook was fixed by the uploader (lnstrumental@EH) with lots of effort, to make it close to the original image, and actually it did.
If there is no way to take it back, a mark on the description like "uploaded by lnstrumental" is also appreciated. Hope the creater of the pool would leave a source at the description.

Well, I guess that's a reasonable altenative way to mention that? It's now added to the description of the pool.

A proper large image is uploaded at post #1037339.

BTW, this image (the one that was watermarked) was actually needlessly "filtered", despite the fact the noise is digitally added for artistic purpose.