Danbooru-based image board with a specialization in high-quality images.
a1 hayase_mitsuki initial-g kimi_ga_nozomu_eien naked nipples

Edit | Respond

OK, there should be a new tag invented (if there isn't one already) for this type of thing where the 'special' parts just aren't drawn, as I find it to be quite common. Perhaps one that could apply to any body part simply not being there...
and what would that tag be called/is called? cause i am noticing it a lot more also
spalose said:
and what would that tag be called/is called? cause i am noticing it a lot more also
I don't know, maybe something like 'lazy_artist' or some short form of it. Never mind, that could offend the artist...
at first i thought it could go under 'error' but at the same time its prob artists decision to leave 'it' out, so that's not really an error now is it?
'special parts' ey...

Why tag something that a) isn't there and b) is fairly well covered by the absence of the tags for specific body parts?
Seems superfluous to me
Perhaps 'missing_parts' or (again) some short form of it...
perhaps this should move over to the forums...
Chrissues said:
Why tag something that a) isn't there and b) is fairly well covered by the absence of the tags for specific body parts?
Seems superfluous to me
You sort of have a point, but i guess so that if someone has a strange attraction to that sort of thing, they could find it with one tag, as opposed to searching 'naked'-'nipples'-'pussy'. Also, not all pics have been fully tagged.
So should this be considered explicit? I mean if it was drawn it would be but...
I believe that drawings with the parts not being "there", are supposed to be considered tasteful "nudity" by the artist depending on the picture, I would see this as an example.
I think it should be tagged as "censored" or "convenient_censoring" or something like that.