...What's wrong with that diamond background..

not only the background, the whole gap was poorly smudged...

I'm adding color_gap to incomplete fixed, but just gap might fit this....

Just tag it "fuxed" :D

I say kill it and start from scratch. I would.

That is a really poor attempt.

Several of the fixed version this user has uploaded before still have issues. Mostly visible smudging to hide the gap repair.

I can understand why this is a child post.Sorry for my editing.

xxxalice said:
I can understand why this is a child post.Sorry for my editing.

Yours? Are you vistaspl's fairy? :P

guess he means tag edits

Yes,I said about my tag editing.

other than the square on top i cant see that many errors... so whats wrong here ?

MDGeist said:
other than the square on top i cant see that many errors... so whats wrong here ?

Change your screen angle to deal with glare then look in the vertical left of her foot

SciFi said:
Change your screen angle to deal with glare then look in the vertical left of her foot

ahhhhh... hmmm, any idea how to remove this effect without bending my monitor ?

MDGeist said:
ahhhhh... hmmm, any idea how to remove this effect without bending my monitor ?

Try stabbing yourself in the eye with a rusty spoon. Fixes anything.

MDGeist said:
ahhhhh... hmmm, any idea how to remove this effect without bending my monitor ?

Alternatively move yourself. If you are referring to the mess in that area, it can't be fixed except by starting again.

Radioactive said:
Try stabbing yourself in the eye with a rusty spoon. Fixes anything.

Still wonder how sb like you is a mod.

Its a hardware issue, my laptop isnt the newest.
If I can fix that using other drivers it would help alot.

MDGeist said:
Still wonder how sb like you is a mod.

I'll remove my tongue from my cheek then (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tongue-in-cheek for people looking for innuendo)

SciFi said:
Alternatively move yourself. If you are referring to the mess in that area, it can't be fixed except by starting again.

pic is awesome for testing.
Its no use to move left/right or up.
Only when i look from down straight up. Strange, wonder if my monitor @ home behaves that way...

Can't see it that well either. Of course since the crease was all wtf I wasn't expecting you lot to be talking about that. It's visible but not by much. My monitor's been more forgiving since I set gamma up right in stead of well.. not right. Which just caused colour-WTF. After all, it's a monitor. Has to display as much as possible correct. If you want everything displayed right, plug your brain in or reincarnate Bob Ross to constantly update your picture ^.^

Of course in stead of discussing we could be fixing \o/

I guess Boss-active didn't really mean it like that going from that link...
.....but never say that to petopeto.
(Brrrr.)

doubt vista and fire see/saw it either...

made some handyshots, now if i only knew how to make this compare stuff
added 2 areas...

for the dot area, could hardly spot the upper left and lower right.
Middle ones were "invisible" like the gap

Of course in stead of discussing we could be fixing \o/

do you know the proverb :

Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach him how to fish and you feed him for a lifetime.

now looking at that image and the other fail, its like he has the same problem as me.

if you compare post #123713 with the original, youll notice that on her one leg part, its where there was a huger gap in the original with other color, not enough smoothing => still noticeable depending on ankle and monitor

this would explain why this attempt failed so hard :

• huger res
• huger cap
• strong color difference between gap and rest

=> looking ok for him, only with the "diamond" shape, but on good monitors it looks like crap

edit:
again, lotsa lotsa hard to see black dots on that pic... is that scanning dust ? or some sort color/scanning error?

MDGeist said:
again, lotsa lotsa hard to see black dots on that pic... is that scanning dust ? or some sort color/scanning error?

Raw scans have zillions of dust and only way to kill them is overfiltering. especially, FM screening doesn't need strong filters, thus there remains many small dusts on them after properly processed. they should be erased by hands not filtering, but if a scanner do all, there are no chance to get high amount of scans. cuz time and speed is the main problem for us.

PS: The main problem on this fix is gradations and edge continuousness which can be seen on the resized sample. if this dust is regarded as a fault, more than half of scans must have same faults.

This is fixable, i've seen worse things fixed properly. So yeah, pointless to discuss whose fault is it ┐('～`；)┌ . As long the good raw is there, everything can be fixed later.

AZD-A9S said:
I guess Boss-active didn't really mean it like that going from that link...
.....but never say that to petopeto.
(Brrrr.)

MDGeist has a Germanic sense of humour.