This post was deleted.
Reason: better fix available. MD5: 07f2382729776991025f882817a190b7
This post belongs to a parent post.
|
|
Please log in. To create a new account, enter the name and password you want to use.
If you supplied an email address when you signed up or added a email later, you can have your password reset.
|
|
Radioactive
almost 14 years agoWhat is the opinion on deleting JPEG fixes? I may just start doing so.
blooregardo
almost 14 years agoRadioactive
almost 14 years agoblooregardo
almost 14 years agoAzarel
almost 14 years agomidzki
almost 14 years agoThere are still many people who is thinking "lossless files shouldn't exist in the Internet"
Radioactive
almost 14 years agoDebbie
almost 14 years agoNot all people have a computer that can bear Photoshop + heavy PNG, for fixing.
This will slowly change, I believe. Or at least I hope.
I too am tired of seeing resized JPEG fixed, it looks like it's a waste of effort or something...
blooregardo
almost 14 years agoRadioactive
almost 14 years agoDebbie
almost 14 years agoPerhaps a fault tag would call their attention.
midzki
almost 14 years agofairyren
almost 14 years agoRadioactive
almost 14 years agoWe have to bring JPEG fixes to the uploaders attention without dissuading them from further fixing. I'm only encouraging JPEG_fix deletions is if the fix was very poorly done, or the image was artifacted.
You still haven't given me a reason not to use the JPEG_fix fault tag.
midzki
almost 14 years agobut I no more think working on moeren who kicked out me :p (they're trolls not regulars who kicked out me, but I couldn't keep on at there which allows trollings)
Radioactive
almost 14 years agomidzki
almost 14 years ago(there is one way we can do.. to change the primal download links from jpeg into png, but it'll cause other demerits)
Radioactive
almost 14 years ago