Close
This post belongs to a parent post.
This post has child posts. (post #202066, 202283, 202284, 202285, 202286, 202287, 202288, 202289, 202290, 202291)
Search
Tags
  • ? hontani kanae 788
  • ? tennenmai yuuhi 3
  • ? breasts 91387
  • ? dakimakura 9043
  • ? fixed 3885
  • ? nipples 180353
  • ? no bra 176215
  • ? open shirt 99887
  • ? pantsu 162478
  • ? panty pull 31357
  • ? pussy 104352
  • ? thighhighs 241540
    • pillowcase panties vulva pantsuga ほんたにかなえ breast underwear pantypull nipple 裏(限定) 表 裏 nobra stitched torn thighhighs thighighs big breasts small breasts medium breasts huge breasts pantsu2 large breasts tighhighs panties under pantyhose thighhigh clitoris open kimono open clothes spread pussy partially unbuttoned pink panties hold-ups black panties cervix pussy pils pink pantsu blue pantsu open cardigan boobs pantsy thighboots vagina thigh boots bow panties white panties white thighhighs red panties wet pussy bikini bottom pull frilled panties visable panties panty peek inverted nipple plump pussy blue panties orange panties single thighhigh puffy nipples lace panties open robe frilled thighhighs maid panties black thighhighs
Statistics
Options
Related Posts




breasts dakimakura fixed hontani_kanae nipples no_bra open_shirt pantsu panty_pull pussy tennenmai_yuuhi thighhighs

Edit | Respond

fireattack
about 12 years ago
I have to say that to stitch a dakimakura doesn't mean just stitch them seamlessly. You should follow the original proportion - http://img.mugimugi.org/imagedb/190/381282.jpg

From this point this fixed one still need work.
castle
about 12 years ago
fireattack said:
I have to say that to stitch a dakimakura doesn't mean just stitch them seamlessly. You should follow the original proportion - http://img.mugimugi.org/imagedb/190/381282.jpg
Which part are you referring to? I took a rough measurement of her proportion and it seems OK. The most noticeable changes are that her navel is shorter and the shading of the bed sheet. I was originally worried that her navel is being too close to her breasts, but that's how the original was.
fireattack
about 12 years ago
basically you need to condence the width of it a little:
http://i.minus.com/icqOtF2VSd9s4.jpg
I tried to align head and left foot, and then the body is out of its position.

Not a big deal, maybe im too picky :/
castle
about 12 years ago
fireattack said:
basically you need to condence the width of it a little:
http://i.minus.com/icqOtF2VSd9s4.jpg
I tried to align head and left foot, and then the body is out of its position.
Her body does squeeze a little bit after her belly. I will see what I can do with the proportion next time. Thanks for noticing that.
Xcalibur
about 12 years ago
I dumped the individual images into ICE and the results were extremely similar with the right camera mode. Proportions seem the same. Maybe I'm not noticing the little details though.....
fireattack
about 12 years ago
yeah ICE sometimes gave very great results for dakimakuras (most of time w/ rotating motion methtod). I checked this one, only 1-2 lines are misaligned, and the porportion is good enough for a auto-stitch software.
Xcalibur
about 12 years ago
I ended up sticking with Planar 1 for the images I tried the other day (with planar 2 and 3 distorting the proportions too much especially the heads), since it seemed like the alignment was slightly worse with rotating motion but I only really compared a couple of images.

I read through the FAQ on the microsoft site which suggests planar is better for compositing multiple flat images (which is what a dakimakura should be), and rotating motion is for traditional panoramic photography. Both modes looked very similar to my eyes I must admit.

It's good enough for an amateur like me anyway.
castle
about 12 years ago
Actually thinking about it more, do you guys have any examples where ICE has major failure? I am curious to see if there is any ways to improve the result.