What's the difference between this and post #225720?

thehypemachine said:
What's the difference between this and post #225720?

1.PNG

2.color

3.size

This one probably has less noise to start with, so it retains details better.

Nice, thanks for spending time fixing these pictures.

Went a little overboard on the saturation IMO.

Xcalibur said:
Went a little overboard on the saturation IMO.

This.

Just give the guy his effort point and his time for scanning / denoising it. His denoising ability is fine. Otherwise use the raw and you guys can denoise it yourself.

It looks fine to me, plus isn't Tinkle's works already really saturated to begin with?

aoie_emesai said:
Just give the guy his effort point and his time for scanning / denoising it. His denoising ability is fine. Otherwise use the raw and you guys can denoise it yourself.

It isn't meant as criticism, but advice; on the assumption that he is interested in improving at his efforts. Of course he deserves credit for the work he is putting in.

awkwardangels said:
It looks fine to me, plus isn't Tinkle's works already really saturated to begin with?

Sometimes, for sure, but the reds are clipping a lot here. Tinkle is definitely fond of heavy red and blue tones though.

支持PNG

hell i don't know why but it definitely looks like a worthy one work

aoie_emesai said:
Just give the guy his effort point and his time for scanning / denoising it. His denoising ability is fine. Otherwise use the raw and you guys can denoise it yourself.

thanks for saying that, I am learning so it's ok.

Xcalibur said:
It isn't meant as criticism, but advice; on the assumption that he is interested in improving at his efforts. Of course he deserves credit for the work he is putting in.

thanks for advice, I am not sensitive with color, but I also recognize the saturation went overboard after I come back, i will upload a new one with the saturation fixed to replace this one.